Skip to main content
Resources

Yeager v. Go Daddy Group, Inc., et al

This page collects filed documents from this lawsuit as related to ICANN. This page does not reflect the entire docket of the litigation. The documents are arranged by filing date in descending order.

Yeager v. Go Daddy Group, Inc., et al
(lawsuit in Common Pleas Court for Franklin County, Ohio)

Decision and Entry Dismissing Plantiff's Complaint without Prejudice [PDF, 75 KB] 11 October 2011
ICANN Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion to Extend Time [PDF, 115 KB] 27 July 2011
Yeager's Second Motion to Extend Time to File Amended Complaint [PDF, 567 KB] 21 July 2011
Plaintiff Yeager's Motion to Extend Time to File Amended Complaint [PDF, 1 MB] 25 June 2011
Order Granting in Part Go Daddy's Motion to Dismiss and Staying Discovery [PDF, 5 MB] 20 June 2011
Yeager's Motion to Remand Disclosure of ICANN Records [PDF, 532 KB] 14 June 2011
Yeager's Petition to Add New Defendant [PDF, 257 KB] 9 June 2011
Yeager's Supplemental Opposition to ICANN's Motion to Dismiss [PDF, 3 MB] 9 June 2011
Go Daddy's Opposition to Yeager's Motion to Strike [PDF, 60 KB] 9 June 2011
ICANN's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint [PDF, 6 MB] 6 June 2011
Yeager's Supplemental Opposition to ICANN's Motion to Dismiss Complaint [PDF, 19 MB] 3 June 2011
Yeager's Opposition to ICANN's Motion to Dismiss Complaint [PDF, 3 MB] 3 June 2011
Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Go Daddy's Motion to Dismiss [PDF, 101 KB] 3 June 2011
Yeager's Opposition to ICANN's Motion to Dismiss Complaint [PDF, 15 MB] 25 May 2011
Go Daddy's Notice Of Filing Supplemental Authority in Support of Motion to Dismiss [PDF, 65 KB] 18 May 2011
ICANN's Motion to Dismiss Complaint [PDF, 3 MB] 13 May 2011
Go Daddy's Motion to Dismiss Complaint [PDF, 2 MB] 3 May 2011
Summons to ICANN [PDF, 2 MB] 7 April 2011
Yeager v. Go Daddy Complaint [PDF, 4.3 MB] 7 April 2011
Domain Name System
Internationalized Domain Name ,IDN,"IDNs are domain names that include characters used in the local representation of languages that are not written with the twenty-six letters of the basic Latin alphabet ""a-z"". An IDN can contain Latin letters with diacritical marks, as required by many European languages, or may consist of characters from non-Latin scripts such as Arabic or Chinese. Many languages also use other types of digits than the European ""0-9"". The basic Latin alphabet together with the European-Arabic digits are, for the purpose of domain names, termed ""ASCII characters"" (ASCII = American Standard Code for Information Interchange). These are also included in the broader range of ""Unicode characters"" that provides the basis for IDNs. The ""hostname rule"" requires that all domain names of the type under consideration here are stored in the DNS using only the ASCII characters listed above, with the one further addition of the hyphen ""-"". The Unicode form of an IDN therefore requires special encoding before it is entered into the DNS. The following terminology is used when distinguishing between these forms: A domain name consists of a series of ""labels"" (separated by ""dots""). The ASCII form of an IDN label is termed an ""A-label"". All operations defined in the DNS protocol use A-labels exclusively. The Unicode form, which a user expects to be displayed, is termed a ""U-label"". The difference may be illustrated with the Hindi word for ""test"" — परीका — appearing here as a U-label would (in the Devanagari script). A special form of ""ASCII compatible encoding"" (abbreviated ACE) is applied to this to produce the corresponding A-label: xn--11b5bs1di. A domain name that only includes ASCII letters, digits, and hyphens is termed an ""LDH label"". Although the definitions of A-labels and LDH-labels overlap, a name consisting exclusively of LDH labels, such as""icann.org"" is not an IDN."