Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Submissions for this Proceeding
Initial Report on the Second CSC Effectiveness Review
View this Proceeding
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) appreciates the opportunity to submit comments on the Initial Report on the Second Customer Standing Committee (CSC) Effectiveness Review.
The ALAC and At-Large community support almost all of the recommendations in the Initial Report, with a few minor exceptions:
(1) The role of chair should be filled by a CSC liaison when no CSC member is available to chair the role. <...
The RySG reviewed the Initial Report and with one major exception and one minor exception, supports its findings and recommendations. The major exception relates to an inconsistency between the Findings and Recommendations related to meeting frequency.
Under "5. Additional topics with potential impact effectiveness CSC" , it was stated as a recommendation number 6 as highlighted below:
"6. Recommendation. The Team recommends that the ccNSO and RySG each appoint one (1) alternate. The Team also recommends that the liaison appointing organizations each appoint one (1) alternate. The CSC recommends that this will be resolved procedurally by the CSC, in consultation with the appointin...
We thankfully note that the overall assessment of the Team is that the CSC is working efficiently. The Team has identified a few areas where things can be made even better, and it has issued a set of recommendations. These are all well received and they align well with how the CSC views these issues. Full details of these are contained in the attachment.
In making its comments, the ccNSO will first make some general observations and then comment on specific findings, recommendations and suggestions.
The ccNSO supports the 2nd Review Team’s conclusion that the CSC operates effectively. The ccNSO welcomes the finding of the Review Team that the CSC has an excellent working relationship with PTI and expects that this working relationship will continue in the futur...
Regarding the effectiveness of the Customer Standing Committee (CSC), it is necessary to review several aspects so that the committee has more power and autonomy.