Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Контент доступен только на следующих языках
Submissions for this Proceeding
Root Zone Label Generation Rules Version 6 (RZ-LGR-6)
View this Proceeding
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
Two things I would like to comment here: (1) one letter to be included in LGR-6 and (2) two rules to be removed from Khmer-specific Rules and Action.
Submission Summary:
Dear Pitinan,
All subscripts shall be occurred at the end of alphabets.
Ex.
ប្រឡង pro long (pr)
ក្របី krobey (Kr)
However, 2 sub scripts are allowed at the end of first subscripts. subscripts are RO (រ) and MO (ម).
Ex.
ស្ត្រី
សាស្ត្រា
លក្ស្មី
លក្ស្មណៈ
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact back.
...
Submission Summary:
To begin, the error identified in the previous document is corrected in the LGR 6 in terms of the Bengali ঔ (U+0994) being tagged as a consonant is rectified and marked as a vowel. This change of identification from consonant to vowel is accepted in the case of ঔ . The character ঔ (AU) is undoubtedly a vowel in the Bengali (Bangla) orthography.
Secondly, The Bengali chandrabindi
Submission Summary:
This is in response to the public comment submitted by the Integration Panel here. (Link:https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/root-zone-label-generation-rules-version-6-rz-lgr-6-17-06-2025/submissions/integration-panel-27-06-2025)
1. Addition of Devanagari Chandrabindu (U+0901) and Bengali Chandrabindu (U+0981) as variants:
This is a valid suggestion and can be incorporated.
Submission Summary:
As Thaana GP member I have reviewed the submission for integration for the thaana RZ rules and overview, and find it to be well formed and sufficient.
Submission Summary:
RZ-LGR is appropriately updated regarding Japanese script.
Submission Summary:
I fully support the integration of the Thaana script into RZ‑LGR‑6 and have no concerns or objections.
Submission Summary:
Variant mappings between Devanagari Candrabindu or Halant and Bangla Candrabindu or Hasant respectively have been identified as missing during the String Similarity Evaluation project. These mappings should be added to this update of the RZ-LGR.
In contrast, the further claim that a variant mapping between Gurmukhi Nukta and Bangla Nukta is also missing, falls apart for the lack of any actual cross-script variant labels due to the constr...