Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Контент доступен только на следующих языках
Submissions for this Proceeding
PTI / IANA Governance Proposal
View this Proceeding
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
The proposed PTI Bylaws amendments seem relatively minor, and reasonable.
The ICANN BC does not have any significant concerns about the proposed PTI Bylaws amendments, and is generally supportive of these proposed PTI Bylaws amendments.
The ICANN BC has been generally satisfied with the functioning of IANA and would like to acknowledge how well IANA serves BC members, including business users, registrants, registrars and registries...
Submission Summary:
From a ccNSO Council perspective the proposed amendments and the reasons are clear and reasonable. The changes appear to make it easier for the community to engage with this process, which is a positive change.
Although the proposed Bylaw changes do not appear to affect this basic principle, the ccNSO Council would strongly support assurances and explicit confirmation by PTI that the safeguards on the separation of ICANN and PTI and ICA...
Submission Summary:
The ccNSO Strategic and Operational Planning Committee (SOPC) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the PTI / IANA Governance Proposal.
The goal of the Committee is to coordinate, facilitate, and encourage the involvement of ccTLD managers in ICANN's strategic and operational, planning and budgetary processes. As a part of its mandate SOPC reviews and comments on ICANN’s and PTI/IANA’s Strategic and Operating Plans and Budgets.
Submission Summary:
The Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed Public Technical Identifiers (PTI) Bylaws amendment. The RySG supports the goal to reduce complexity in planning processes and to increase alignment with other existing ICANN planning processes.
Submission Summary:
The lack of clarity about how the audit findings will be shared with the public.
The proposed timeframe of 90 days is too short.