Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Контент доступен только на следующих языках
The Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed Public Technical Identifiers (PTI) Bylaws amendment. The RySG supports the goal to reduce complexity in planning processes and to increase alignment with other existing ICANN planning processes.
In particular, the RySG has noted the difference between the five-year ICANN planning window and PTI’s four-year cycle in earlier public comments [1]. We are pleased to see this amended with the proposed changes. We believe that the changes will increase the efficiency of the various planning processes and enable the Community to more effectively engage and participate in those processes.
We thank the team for its hard work to evaluate and recommend well scoped changes to the PTI Bylaws to increase efficiency.
[1] Past RySG Comments on the draft IANA and PTI Operating Plans and Budgets FY24 (Nov 2022) , and its comments on the Draft PTI FY21-24 Strategic Plan (June 2020).
The Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed Public Technical Identifiers (PTI) Bylaws amendment. The RySG supports the goal to reduce complexity in planning processes and to increase alignment with other existing ICANN planning processes.