Skip to main content

Structural Improvements Committee (SIC) Meeting - Minutes

SIC Members: Ray Plzak – Chair; Bertrand de La Chappelle; George Sadowsky, Reinhard Scholl, and Mike Silber

Other Board Attendees: Sébastien Bachollet, Cherine Chalaby, Chris Disspain, and Erika Mann

Invited Attendee: Judith Vasquez

Staff Attendees: Akram Atallah, Chief Operating Officer; David Olive, Vice President, Policy Development Support; Samantha Eisner, Denise Michel, and Alina Syunkova

The following is a summary of discussions, decisions, and actions identified:

The meeting was called to order at 4:32 pm local time in Santa Monica, California.

  1. Board Technical Relations Working Group (TRWG) Draft Report – The SIC discussed the report of the TRWG and the recommendations that the SIC should provide further advice on the provision of technical advice to the Board. The SIC discussed the current TLG structure and how relationships with component organizations may be strengthened.
    • Action:
      • SIC to continue discussion in Dakar, after members provide some recommendations for discussion.
  2. RSSAC Review Implementation – Received an update from staff on the status of the RSSAC Review implementation work, noting that a draft implementation plan is under consultation with the SIC and members of the RSSAC community prior to providing a final plan for the Board's approval.
    • Action:
      • Chair and staff to perform consultations to follow up on additional input into the RSSAC review plan.
  3. Organizational Review Cycle Planning – The SIC initiated discussion of review criteria in preparation for the next cycle of organizational reviews required under the Bylaws, as well as the review of Constituencies within the GNSO. A proposed model for review was drafted on the Constituency Recognition Process, with a goal of providing defined and objective criteria to guide the reviewers. The SIC discussed incorporating criteria raised in the Affirmation of Commitments as part of the organizational reviews, as possible, to help create synergies among the two types of reviews.
    • Action:
      • Staff to produce documents for further discussion regarding proposed criteria for reviews.
  4. ASO Review – The SIC received an update on the progress of the ASO review.

The meeting adjourned at 5:53 pm local time.

Domain Name System
Internationalized Domain Name ,IDN,"IDNs are domain names that include characters used in the local representation of languages that are not written with the twenty-six letters of the basic Latin alphabet ""a-z"". An IDN can contain Latin letters with diacritical marks, as required by many European languages, or may consist of characters from non-Latin scripts such as Arabic or Chinese. Many languages also use other types of digits than the European ""0-9"". The basic Latin alphabet together with the European-Arabic digits are, for the purpose of domain names, termed ""ASCII characters"" (ASCII = American Standard Code for Information Interchange). These are also included in the broader range of ""Unicode characters"" that provides the basis for IDNs. The ""hostname rule"" requires that all domain names of the type under consideration here are stored in the DNS using only the ASCII characters listed above, with the one further addition of the hyphen ""-"". The Unicode form of an IDN therefore requires special encoding before it is entered into the DNS. The following terminology is used when distinguishing between these forms: A domain name consists of a series of ""labels"" (separated by ""dots""). The ASCII form of an IDN label is termed an ""A-label"". All operations defined in the DNS protocol use A-labels exclusively. The Unicode form, which a user expects to be displayed, is termed a ""U-label"". The difference may be illustrated with the Hindi word for ""test"" — परीका — appearing here as a U-label would (in the Devanagari script). A special form of ""ASCII compatible encoding"" (abbreviated ACE) is applied to this to produce the corresponding A-label: xn--11b5bs1di. A domain name that only includes ASCII letters, digits, and hyphens is termed an ""LDH label"". Although the definitions of A-labels and LDH-labels overlap, a name consisting exclusively of LDH labels, such as"""" is not an IDN."