Skip to main content

Final Report Recommendations of the Geographic Regions Review Working Group

Forum Announcement: Public Comment Period opens on Date: 23 December 2015
Categories/Tags: Reviews/Improvements
Purpose (Brief):

The cross-community Geographic Regions Review Working Group has produced its Final Report in which it proposes a series of recommendations regarding the ongoing application of the organization’s geographic regions framework.

The ICANN Board is interested in further community reaction to those recommendations and has instructed the Staff to open and manage a public comment period of at least 120 days to give the community an opportunity to thoroughly review the proposals and provide any additional comments on the working group recommendations.

The Working Group’s Final Report provides an extensive series of conclusions, proposals and recommendations including:

  1. The Working Group concludes that the general principle of geographic diversity is valuable and should be preserved.
  2. Application of the geographic diversity principles must be more rigorous, clear and consistent.
  3. Adjusting the number of ICANN geographic regions is not currently practical.
  4. No other International Regional Structures offer useful options for ICANN.
  5. ICANN must formally adopt and maintain its own unique Geographic Regions Framework.
  6. The Community wants to minimize any changes to the current structure.
  7. ICANN must acknowledge the sovereignty and right of self-determination of states to let them choose their region of allocation.
  8. ICANN communities have flexibly applied geographic diversity principles over the years. While the Board should remain strictly subject to the current framework, flexibility should be preserved for other structures.
  9. “Special Interest Groups” or “Cross-Regional Sub-Groups” offer new diversity opportunities.
  10. Implementation mechanisms and processes must be developed by Staff; and
  11. The Board must preserve its oversight and future review opportunities.

The extensive comment period will give individuals and community groups an opportunity to thoroughly review the proposals and provide any additional comments on the working group recommendations.

Public Comment Box Link:

More Announcements
Domain Name System
Internationalized Domain Name ,IDN,"IDNs are domain names that include characters used in the local representation of languages that are not written with the twenty-six letters of the basic Latin alphabet ""a-z"". An IDN can contain Latin letters with diacritical marks, as required by many European languages, or may consist of characters from non-Latin scripts such as Arabic or Chinese. Many languages also use other types of digits than the European ""0-9"". The basic Latin alphabet together with the European-Arabic digits are, for the purpose of domain names, termed ""ASCII characters"" (ASCII = American Standard Code for Information Interchange). These are also included in the broader range of ""Unicode characters"" that provides the basis for IDNs. The ""hostname rule"" requires that all domain names of the type under consideration here are stored in the DNS using only the ASCII characters listed above, with the one further addition of the hyphen ""-"". The Unicode form of an IDN therefore requires special encoding before it is entered into the DNS. The following terminology is used when distinguishing between these forms: A domain name consists of a series of ""labels"" (separated by ""dots""). The ASCII form of an IDN label is termed an ""A-label"". All operations defined in the DNS protocol use A-labels exclusively. The Unicode form, which a user expects to be displayed, is termed a ""U-label"". The difference may be illustrated with the Hindi word for ""test"" — परीका — appearing here as a U-label would (in the Devanagari script). A special form of ""ASCII compatible encoding"" (abbreviated ACE) is applied to this to produce the corresponding A-label: xn--11b5bs1di. A domain name that only includes ASCII letters, digits, and hyphens is termed an ""LDH label"". Although the definitions of A-labels and LDH-labels overlap, a name consisting exclusively of LDH labels, such as"""" is not an IDN."