Skip to main content

ICANN Takes Steps to Move VeriSign Contract Dispute from Litigation to Arbitration

Marina del Rey (November 12, 2004) – ICANN has initiated efforts to enforce the arbitration clause of VeriSign’s .net Registry Agreement and move the VeriSign lawsuit into an international arbitration forum. ICANN has filed its demand for arbitration pursuant to the terms of the current .NET Registry Agreement and in response to litigation VeriSign re-initiated in a California state court following the US Federal District Court’s dismissal of its anti-trust allegations earlier this year. ICANN is hopeful that the arbitration proceeding will provide a quick and efficient resolution to the outstanding dispute between the parties. ICANN sent its arbitration demand to the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris which is designated within the current .NET agreement as the arbitration forum for disputes arising relating to the terms of that agreement.

In addition to ICANN’s arbitration demand, ICANN has filed today an answer to VeriSign's California state court complaint, and also a counterclaim asking the court to find that VeriSign is in breach of its .COM registry agreement with ICANN. ICANN has also asked the court to stay the .COM litigation initiated by VeriSign until the conclusion of the .net arbitration, since the arbitration will examine and resolve the same issues.

“ICANN's goal is to resolve this dispute as quickly and efficiently as possible, for the benefit of the Internet Community,” said John Jeffrey, ICANN’s General Counsel.

When VeriSign chose to file a lawsuit in federal district court in Los Angeles alleging antitrust violations by ICANN and seeking a declaratory judgment with respect to various disputes about the interpretation of the .com Registry Agreement, ICANN was not in a position to insist that those disputes be arbitrated. Subsequently, VeriSign's antitrust claims were dismissed with prejudice by the district court, which removed any jurisdictional basis for that court to resolve the contract disputes. VeriSign then re-filed its contract claims in state court.

ICANN remains aware that this is not a private dispute but one in which has a direct impact on the Internet Community, which has an important stake in the outcome of these matters. At the heart of this dispute is the form of agreement between ICANN and Verisign. Registry agreements provide for the Internet community (through ICANN) to oversee the operation of monopoly top level domains (TLDs) to ensure that they are operated for the benefit of the community. Through arbitration, ICANN expects to have the Registry Agreements terms affirmed, while minimizing the costs imposed by the litigation.

Request for Arbitration

Answer to Complaint

Motion to Stay

ICANN's Cross-Complaint


ICANN is an internationally organized, public benefit non-profit responsible for coordinating Internet Protocol (IP) address space allocation, protocol identifier assignment, generic (gTLD) and country code (ccTLD) Top-Level Domain name system management, and root server system management functions. For more information please visit:

Media Contact: Media inquiries, please contact Kieran Baker, ICANN + 1-310-301-5801 or

More Announcements
Domain Name System
Internationalized Domain Name ,IDN,"IDNs are domain names that include characters used in the local representation of languages that are not written with the twenty-six letters of the basic Latin alphabet ""a-z"". An IDN can contain Latin letters with diacritical marks, as required by many European languages, or may consist of characters from non-Latin scripts such as Arabic or Chinese. Many languages also use other types of digits than the European ""0-9"". The basic Latin alphabet together with the European-Arabic digits are, for the purpose of domain names, termed ""ASCII characters"" (ASCII = American Standard Code for Information Interchange). These are also included in the broader range of ""Unicode characters"" that provides the basis for IDNs. The ""hostname rule"" requires that all domain names of the type under consideration here are stored in the DNS using only the ASCII characters listed above, with the one further addition of the hyphen ""-"". The Unicode form of an IDN therefore requires special encoding before it is entered into the DNS. The following terminology is used when distinguishing between these forms: A domain name consists of a series of ""labels"" (separated by ""dots""). The ASCII form of an IDN label is termed an ""A-label"". All operations defined in the DNS protocol use A-labels exclusively. The Unicode form, which a user expects to be displayed, is termed a ""U-label"". The difference may be illustrated with the Hindi word for ""test"" — परीका — appearing here as a U-label would (in the Devanagari script). A special form of ""ASCII compatible encoding"" (abbreviated ACE) is applied to this to produce the corresponding A-label: xn--11b5bs1di. A domain name that only includes ASCII letters, digits, and hyphens is termed an ""LDH label"". Although the definitions of A-labels and LDH-labels overlap, a name consisting exclusively of LDH labels, such as"""" is not an IDN."