Public Comment

Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.

Contenido disponible solo en los siguientes idiomas

  • English

Name: Diksha Neeladoo B. Simmandree
Date: 11 Feb 2026
Preliminary Recommendation 1
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 2
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 3
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 4
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 5
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 6
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 7
Support Recommendation as written
Implementation Guidance 8
Support Implementation Guidance as written
Preliminary Recommendation 9
Support Recommendation as written
Implementation Guidance 10
Support Implementation Guidance as written
Implementation Guidance 11
Support Implementation Guidance as written
Preliminary Recommendation 12
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 13
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 14
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 15
Support Recommendation as written
Implementation Guidance 16
Support Implementation Guidance as written
Preliminary Recommendation 17
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 18
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 19
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 20
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 21
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 22
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 23
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 24
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 25
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 26
Support Recommendation as written
Implementation Guidance 27
Support Implementation Guidance as written
Preliminary Recommendation 28
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 29
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 30
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 31
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 32
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 33
Support Recommendation as written
Implementation Guidance 34
Support Implementation Guidance as written
Preliminary Recommendation 35
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 36
Support Recommendation as written
Implementation Guidance 37
Support Implementation Guidance as written
Preliminary Recommendation 38
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 39
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 40
Support Recommendation as written
Implementation Guidance 41
Support Implementation Guidance as written
Preliminary Recommendation 42
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 43
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 44
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 45
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 46
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 47
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 48
Support Recommendation as written
Implementation Guidance 49
Support Implementation Guidance as written
Preliminary Recommendation 50
Support Recommendation as written
Preliminary Recommendation 51
Support Recommendation as written
Implementation Guidance 52
Support Implementation Guidance as written
Preliminary Recommendation 53
Support Recommendation as written
Implementation Guidance 54
Support Implementation Guidance as written
Other Comments

I appreciate the LD PDP Working Group’s effort to address the current policy gap surrounding Latin-script diacritic gTLDs that are not treated as variants of their base ASCII forms. As the DNS continues to support broader multilingual and culturally accurate domain usage, it is important to establish a mechanism that enables a single registry operator to manage both the ASCII and diacritic versions in a coordinated and secure way.

The WG’s preliminary recommendations appear to provide a constructive starting point for ensuring consistent user experience, reducing confusion, and supporting linguistic diversity, while maintaining operational stability in the gTLD space. I encourage the WG to ensure that any proposed mechanism includes clear safeguards against misuse, strong alignment with existing IDN and variant policies, and predictable implementation guidance for registries and applicants.