Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
هذا المحتوى متوفر فقط باللغة (أو اللغات)
Submissions for this Proceeding
ICANN Public Meeting Proposed Dates for 2029–2033
View this Proceeding
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
The IPC strongly supports ICANN’s efforts to avoiding conflicts with community events and globally recognized nonworking or religious observance days wherever possible and largely agrees with the proposed dates for the ICANN Public Meetings between 2029 and 2032.
However, as mentioned, there are some globally recognized religious observance days that could potentially be more problematic than others, namely,
Reformation Da...
Submission Summary:
Please find attached the PDF ALAC statement.
Ratification record is included in the cover page.
Kind regards,
ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large community
Facebook: facebook.com/icann.atlarge
Submission Summary:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed dates for 2029–2033. While planning appreciate the advanced planning, I would like to raise concerns regarding potential conflicts with major cultural and religious observances that may impact global participation
ICANN 94 and 106 is likely to overlap or fall immediately to Ramadan, this may affect the participation of members of the Muslim community. Also ICANN105 and 108 is closely o...
Submission Summary:
The gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback to ICANN on the ICANN public meeting proposed dates for 2029-2033. The RySG does not have concerns with the proposed dates, but encourages ICANN to avoid scheduling public meetings during the transitions between daylight savings time and standard time. Because these dates often vary by region, or even country, the RySG encourages ICANN to c...
Submission Summary:
The Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC) appreciates this opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed dates for ICANN public meetings from 2029 - 2033.
Many RSSAC members and RSSAC Caucus members also attend Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) meetings To the extent possible, the RSSAC prefers ICANN meetings not be scheduled in the week immediately before or after IETF meetings (i.e., back-to-back).
<...
Submission Summary:
The RrSG thanks the ICANN staff team for their work in avoiding overlaps with religious holidays. While it is helpful to have the meeting date information available at least five years in advance, the RrSG notes that knowing the meeting location is just as important, as it allows attendees to book travel and accommodations well in advance while prices are lower.
Submission Summary:
I appreciate ICANN’s continued effort to plan public meeting dates well in advance, maintaining transparency and alignment with the community’s operational calendars. Early publication of proposed dates for 2029–2033 demonstrates commitment to predictability and inclusivity.
However, after reviewing the proposed dates and cross-referencing them with major global, regional, and religious observances, several important con...
Submission Summary:
I would suggest following points to consider:
1. Check for movable religious observances (Ramadan, Easter) and national holidays in likely host countries for each proposed year and commit to adjusting dates when conflicts are found.
2. Add a minimum two-week buffer between the AGM and adjacent IETF/RIPE events to reduce attendee travel burden/conflict and improve cross-community participation (There may be people inter...