Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
本内容仅提供以下语言版本
The Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Second IANA Naming Function Review (IFR) Initial Report and extends its thanks to the members of the Review Team for their work on this effort.
Members of the RySG operate generic top-level domains via contracts with ICANN, and are the direct customers of the IANA Naming Function. We recognize the important role the IFR plays in ensuring the ongoing accountability of PTI as the steward of the IANA function and as such have reviewed the Initial Report with keen interest. We are pleased to note that the RySG supports each of the recommendations contained therein, as we believe they will promote transparency and improve efficiencies going forward.
The RySG also supports the IFR’s inclusion of Incidental Findings, which “did not rise to the level of a formal recommendation”, as a means to promote efficiency in the Review Process and as a demonstration that the IFR was operating according to its documented Terms of Reference.
The RySG supports each of the recommendations contained therein, as we believe they will promote transparency and improve efficiencies going forward. The RySG also supports the IFR’s inclusion of Incidental Findings.