Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
本内容仅提供以下语言版本
If the agreement isn’t rejected outright, ICANN and Verisign should produce an updated draft agreement, incorporating the public input, for a second round of public comments.
This 38 page PDF represents the entirety of our submission.
The Board should reject the final proposed renewal agreement in its entirety. It is a product of regulatory capture of ICANN by the abusive monopolist Verisign.
We documented obvious errors and weaknesses in the agreement, including flawed language (possibly an inadvertent change) related to reserved names.
The RRA must be changed to incorporate the interests of registrants, include rights to due process, that are completely absent in this one-sided agreement. We recommend a GNSO Working Group create a Uniform RRA for all gTLDs.
We reiterated that there should be a competitive tender for operation of the .NET TLD (and for .COM). These should be regular fixed term contracts, without presumptive renewal. These competitive tenders should be a regular part of ICANN’s operations, to ensure that registrants are getting great service at the lowest possible fee.
We also pointed out additional problematic sections of the agreement.