Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Контент доступен только на следующих языках
Submissions for this Proceeding
Transfer Policy Review Working Group Final Report for ICANN Board Consideration
View this Proceeding
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
Tucows thanks the Transfer Policy Review Working Group members, leadership team, and ICANN Staff for all their hard work and dedication over the past few years.
The outcomes in the Working Group’s Recommendations generally meet this goal, although we would have been pleased to see further changes such as full removal of the Losing FOA and a robust transfer reversal process including a low-cost dispute process available directl...
Submission Summary:
This Final Report represents a critical step toward improving the integrity and user experience of domain name transfers. The deliberations reflect the strength of ICANN’s multistakeholder model, where consensus emerges through rigorous debate and diverse perspectives. The Recommendations strike a careful balance between security, user rights, and operational efficiency. The BC views this as a constructive foundation for continued trust in the...
Submission Summary:
The Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) thanks the Transfer Policy Review Working Group members, leadership, and ICANN Staff for their many hours of dedicated work on this important project, and appreciates the opportunity to provide a comment on this Final Report, which is attached in full.
The security and availability of domain transfers is a crucial aspect of the Domain Name System. This Working Group has issued Recom...
Submission Summary:
The gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) appreciates the opportunity to provide feedback to the ICANN Board on the Final Report of the Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (the “Final Report”). The RySG supports the Final Report as drafted and recommends the ICANN Board adopt all recommendations.
Submission Summary:
The 19-page document LEAP-comments-Transfers-FinalReport-20250615-FINAL.pdf is the main submission for the current comment period.
Submission Summary:
مرحبا بالجميع لم اتوقع تواجدي معكم اليوم رغم الجهد اللذي
بذلته لتحقيق هدف وهو مساعده الاخرين
فسعادتي اليوم ليست بلقب تمت اضافته ولكن بتواجدى معكم فأنتم الاضافه الحقيقيه
Submission Summary:
Merger and acquisitions happen. The process can be tedious and expensive. Having proper handover process is critical.
Submission Summary:
Summary - Hardship protections for domain resellers during domain transfers
Domain resellers face significant challenges when transferring large portfolios due to an upstream registrar's acquisition, bankruptcy, sanctions or dissolution. The process is costly, time-consuming, and potentially disrupts customer's domain services, with limited options for resellers to maintain pricing or automation.
Key Points...
Submission Summary:
60 days lock should be removed or atleast reduced to 30 days.
Submission Summary:
Hi,
60 days lock should be removed or atleast reduced to 30 days.
Thanks
Submission Summary:
I think a 30-day transfer wait period should be the standard.