Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Контент доступен только на следующих языках
Submissions for this Proceeding
Review of Reviews Draft Report
View this Proceeding
Provide Your Input
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
Support for ICANN’s Review of Reviews effort and its goal of creating a more focused, sustainable, and effective review system. It notes support for retaining a scheduled Accountability and Transparency Review, creating a Structural Review, establishing On-Demand Reviews, strengthening implementation oversight, and independently assessing the Continuous Improvement Program before it replaces Organizational Reviews.
At the same time, the...
Submission Summary:
MY submission supports the overall direction of the proposed review framework while recommending several improvements to enhance its clarity, consistency, transparency, and operational efficiency without changing its underlying policy objectives.
First, I recommend clarifying the composition of the proposed Community Liaison Working Group by requiring one or more representatives identified by the Supporting Organizations...
Submission Summary:
"Wilhelmina Balloon Installations is a full-service balloon décor company serving Port Washington, WI and nearby areas. We specialize in custom balloon décor that adds style, color, and personality to every event. From large-scale celebrations to private parties and small gatherings, our balloon decorations are designed to fit your vision, theme, and space. We work closely with our clients to create unique balloon installations that deliver a ...
Submission Summary:
This submission supports the Reviews CCG's Draft Report and its goal to transition ICANN toward a more efficient, agile reviews system. However, it warns that the proposed framework focuses too heavily on the front-end scoping of reviews while ignoring the real historical bottleneck: ICANN’s recommendation implementation backlog. It also identifies a high risk of the new "On-Demand" review pillar being politicized to delay policy work unless s...
Submission Summary:
This submission supports the proposed Review of Reviews framework as a positive step toward improving ICANN's accountability, transparency, and effectiveness. It also encourages ICANN to maintain accessible and inclusive review processes that promote meaningful participation from underserved and underrepresented communities while strengthening trust in the multistakeholder model.
Submission Summary:
This submission supports ICANN’s effort to modernize and improve the efficiency of its review framework through the Review of Reviews Draft Report. However, the submission recommends that the final framework include stronger transparency and accountability safeguards for the proposed Review Scoping Committee (RSC), because the RSC would play an important role in determining review initiation, scope, scheduling, feasibility, and resource alloca...