Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Контент доступен только на следующих языках
Submissions for this Proceeding
Draft PTI FY26 Operating Plan and Budget
View this Proceeding
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
The RrSG appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Draft PTI FY26 Operating Plan and Budget. The RrSG particularly supports the budget’s focus on implementing an IANA long-term sustainability plan and preparations for the next round of new generic top-level domains. The RrSG has no further specific comments.
Thank you,
Owen Smigelski
Registrar Stakeholder Group Chair
Submission Summary:
In general, the RySG supports the PTI FY26 Operating Plan and Budget. We would welcome greater specificity on how preparations for the next round are being accounted for, as well as more clarity on the duration and impact of multi-year projects.
Submission Summary:
SOPC has been stressing that adequate resourcing of PTI’s operations and development work needs to be ensured now and in the years to come. ICANN has to make PTI the highest priority.
It is the understanding of the SOPC that the PTI budget is part of the IANA budget which is part of the overall ICANN budget. SOPC appreciates the explanation provided by ICANN in response to previous year comments that the PTI budget has its own contingenc...
Submission Summary:
Please find attached (PDF) the ALAC Statement on Draft PTI FY26 Operating Plan and Budget. Ratification information is included on the cover page.Kind Regards,
ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community
Website: atlarge.icann.org
Facebook: