Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Контент доступен только на следующих языках
The gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Evaluation Guide for Community Priority Evaluation (CPE).
In our comments on the draft AGB, we stressed the importance of the CPE process because of the advantage it confers to successful applicants. The CPE Provider must be sufficiently trained and informed, and understand the weight of the process, to ensure that applicants are evaluated properly (i.e., that CPE does not result in either "false positives” or “false negatives”.
Building on the RySG’s comments to the final AGB public comment proceeding, the RySG believes it is important to highlight that the CPE panel should consider both comments in support and comments in opposition to the application, submitted during the application comment period. Similarly, the CPE panel should observe the Objections process to ensure that formal Objections submitted on an application also factor into the evaluation. This includes introducing an explicit reference to public comments (what is called Community Input in the AGB) as a factor that evaluators can elect to consider.
The RySG believes it is important to highlight that the CPE panel should consider both comments in support and comments in opposition to the application, submitted during the application comment period. Similarly, the CPE panel should observe the Objections process to ensure that formal Objections submitted on an application also factor into the evaluation. This includes introducing an explicit reference to public comments (what is called Community Input in the AGB) as a factor that evaluators can elect to consider.