Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Ce contenu est uniquement disponible en
Submissions for this Proceeding
ICANN FY26–30 Operating & Financial Plan, ICANN/IANA FY26 Op Plans & Budgets
View this Proceeding
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
As the ICANN community prepares for a new five-year strategic operating cycle, these comments look to confirm expectations and aspirations that the GAC has for certain programs and initiatives that will support the continued relevance, transparency and accountability of the mutistakeholder model and the contributions that governments make to that ecosystem.
Submission Summary:
The Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the ICANN Draft FY26 Plans (the Draft FY26-30 Operating & Financial Plan, Draft FY26 Operating Plan & Budget and Draft IANA FY26 Operating Plan and Budget). The RySG comments are attached.
Submission Summary:
The RrSG appreciate the opportunity to comment on the ICANN FY26–30 Operating & Financial Plan, and the ICANN/IANA FY26 Op Plans & Budgets. We note that some of the areas we have comments on are also being considered in the “How We Meet” process underway at this time. The RrSG comments on costs and potential cost reduction relating to public meetings, constituent travel, and salary transparency.
Submission Summary:
The Business Constituency (BC) generally supports the financial projections but emphasizes the need for DNS Abuse enforcement, stakeholder balance, and financial transparency. The BC calls for clear DNS Abuse mitigation measures, funding for an NCPH Summit, and clarity on ICANN’s contingency budget. Ensuring equitable stakeholder participation and responsible financial planning is essential for ICANN’s sustainability and effectiveness in inter...
Submission Summary:
According to the SOPC Charter, the Committee may provide input on the Public Comment forum, and subsequently relate back to ICANN and/or other Supporting Organizations, Advisory Committees and/or advisory WGs. The views expressed in this submission are of the SOPC’s only.
The SOPC again appreciates ICANN’s efforts: the documents are well prepared and consistent. However SOPC has comments and questions regarding some elements of the Oper...
Submission Summary:
Please find attached (PDF) the ALAC Statement on the ICANN FY26-30 Operating & Financial Plan, ICANN/IANA FY26 Op Plans & Budgets. Ratification information is included on the cover page.Kind Regards,
ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community
Website: atlarge.icann.org
Facebook:
Submission Summary:
In my short comments, I recognize the draft plans and budgets as thoughtful and structured, reflecting a solid approach to ICANN’s operational and strategic priorities. However, I have suggested specific improvements to enhance transparency and accountability. Additionally, I recommend breaking down personnel costs and headcount shifts in greater detail to improve clarity on resource allocation.