Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Contenido disponible solo en los siguientes idiomas
Submissions for this Proceeding
Proposal for Thaana script Root Zone Label Generation Rules
View this Proceeding
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
The Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed Thaana script RZ-LGR. Members of the RySG have reviewed the proposed RZ-LGR and have no concerns with the proposal.
Submission Summary:
This will be a good start. Once usage increases we can better understand gaps and test assumptions that we have when this got drafted and created. I believe this has had enough technical input to go forward to public.
Submission Summary:
Positive and agreeable.
Submission Summary:
I find the proposed Thaana Script LGR clear and well thought out. It includes the core letters and vowels we use daily and smartly leaves out less common extended consonants. Including ޱ (baru noonu) makes sense given its rise online, and it’s helpful to see ނ and ރ treated like other consonants. Overall, it feels accurate and practical
Submission Summary:
I support this proposal as it currently is.
Submission Summary:
This submission offers qualified support for the Proposal for Thaana Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules. While the community-based development and consideration of the Thaana script's structure are positive aspects, the proposal lacks sufficient detail in explaining the rationale behind repertoire decisions, the comprehensive analysis of potential cross-script security concerns, and a formal specification of the proposed rules. To improve...
Submission Summary:
General overview of the current proposal aligns with the baseline proposal, and offers good coverage for the rootzone. Additional compatibility with LGR is good. I am happy with how this looks.