Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Contenido disponible solo en los siguientes idiomas
Submissions for this Proceeding
Draft IANA and PTI FY24 Operating Plan and Budgets
View this Proceeding
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
The BC supports the draft FY24 IANA Budget for PTI of $10.5 million though it is $0.6 million higher than the FY23 budget and IANA budget of $0.6M (services not performed by PTI).
We support the Caretaker IANA Budget to stay in force until the IANA budget has been approved by the ICANN Board and not rejected by the Empowered Community.
In the attached comment we raise several questions and make requests for clarification or amendme...
On September 15, 2022, ICANN published the Draft IANA and PTI FY24 Operating Plan and Budgets, requesting feedback from the community. We note that ICANN published the draft Plan and Budgets as part of the PTI 2020- 2024 Strategic Plan.
We welcome the work of ICANN on releasing the document in line with Workstream 2 Recommendations on ICANN Transparency. Our analysis shows that, primarily, the document is a good first step but has ...
The Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) appreciates this opportunity to comment on the Draft IANA and PTI FY24 Operating Plan and Budgets. The RrSG is very pleased to again see an increase in the amount of information and explanations provided and commend ICANN on this improvement. The ‘key comparisons to previous year’s budget’ on page 20 in particular was found to be a very useful addition to the report.
Overall, the RySG supports the PTI FY24 Budget and Operating Plan. The RySG recognizes and appreciates the hard work by PTI to maintain a constant headcount in the budget. However, as described elsewhere in our submission, we note the following:
- The RySG would like to see IANA/PTI examine opportunities for operational efficiency, especially in the area of metrics;
- The FY24 plan includes a project related to a “signi...
We suggest creating a guide with the main PTI OP&B items;
The ccNSO Strategic and Operating Planning Committee (SOPC) welcomes the opportunity to comment on Draft IANA and PTI FY24 Operational Plan and Budgets.
SOPC developed these comments based on the result of the consultation with representatives of the ccNSO Technical Working Group.
SOPC in general supports the proposed Draft IANA and PTI FY24 Operating Plan and Budgets. Our main concerns are regarding the ccNSO PDPs implementa...
The At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and At-Large welcome this opportunity to respond to the specific questions posed in the call for Public Comment.
The ALAC and At-Large are in support of the budgets as proposed, with a few exceptions.
The ALAC has concerns regarding the Public Technical Identifiers (PTI) headcount, travel expenses, and budget. They are also concerned that critical functions of...