Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Submissions for this Proceeding
ISPCP Constituency Charter Amendments
View this Proceeding
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
The BC has reviewed the proposed amendments to the ISPC Charter (the “Amended Charter”) and observes that generally, the Amended Charter appears to be well-drafted and easily comprehensible.
The BC has no objection to the Amended Charter and trusts that it accurately reflects the mandate and processes of ISPCP members.
Submission Summary:
The Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) appreciates the work of the ISPCP in general, as well as their dedication to transparency, as demonstrated in the Charter’s Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest requirements. The RySG encourages all community groups to incorporate clear transparency requirements that are in line with the requirements in the ICANN Bylaws.
Submission Summary:
The statement highlights important issues regarding the proposed amendments to the ISPCP Constituency charter and proffered solutions, including confusion and delays in decision-making, potential conflicts of interest, lack of transparency, and the effectiveness of the Outreach and Engagement Committee. To ensure the success of the amendments, the ISPCP must ensure that the provisions for decision-making are clear and concise, that all members...