Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
هذا المحتوى متوفر فقط باللغة (أو اللغات)
Submissions for this Proceeding
FY26-FY30 Middle East Regional Plan
View this Proceeding
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
To ensure effective governance and inclusivity within the ICANN framework, it is crucial to address regional considerations such as the widespread use of common scripts, which necessitates greater focus on the Unique Identifier system. Transparency in standardization is essential, particularly in cases where domain similarities arise due to pronunciation-based distinctions.
In line with the multi-stakeholder model, Internet governance an...
Submission Summary:
Overall, the Draft FY26-FY30 Middle East Regional Plan presents a positive framework for ICANN's engagement in the region. It aligns with ICANN's strategic objectives and identifies relevant areas for activity. However, the plan needs to be more critical and enhance its measurability and specificity. The "Desired Outcomes" often lack concrete metrics, hindering effective progress assessment. I suggest that ICANN refine the plan to include more...
Submission Summary:
The plan fosters collaboration with a diverse range of stakeholders, including governments, academic institutions, technical communities, and regional organizations. This multi-stakeholder approach can help leverage resources and expertise while ensuring that activities align with broader regional initiatives.
However, some goals depend on external factors beyond ICANN’s control. For example, the objective to “Keep governments in the...