Public Comment

Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.

Ce contenu est uniquement disponible en

  • English

Name: Marianne Georgelin
Date: 29 Jan 2025
Affiliation: Afnic
1) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for Application Comments (Topic 28: Role of Application Comment) consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report recommendations?
Yes
2) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for GAC Member Early Warnings (Topic 30: GAC Consensus Advice and GAC Early Warning) consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report recommendations?
Yes
3) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for GAC Advice (Topic 30: GAC Consensus Advice and GAC Early Warning) consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report recommendations?
Yes
4) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for Singular/Plural Notification (Topic 24: String Similarity Evaluations) consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report recommendations?
Yes
5) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for Objections (Topic 31: Objections and Topic 32: Limited Challenge/Appeal Mechanism) consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report and IDN EPDP Phase 1 Final Report recommendations?
Yes
6) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for ICANN Dispute Resolution Procedure (Topic 31: Objections and Topic 32: Limited Challenge/Appeal Mechanism) consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report and IDN EPDP Phase 1 Final Report recommendations?
Yes
7) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for ICANN Objection Appeals Procedure (Topic 31: Objections and Topic 32: Limited Challenge/Appeal Mechanism) consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report and IDN EPDP Phase 1 Final Report recommendations?
Yes
8) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for New gTLD Program: Next Round Privacy Policy consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report recommendations?
Yes
9) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for Post-Contracting consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report recommendations
Yes
10) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for DNS Stability consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report recommendations?
Yes
11) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for Security and Stability (Topic 26: Security and Stability) consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report recommendations?
Yes
12) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for Different TLD Types (Topic 4: Different TLD Types) consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report recommendations and IDN EPDP Phase 1 Final Report recommendations?
Yes
13) Is the proposed Next Round Applicant Guidebook language for Legal Compliance Check consistent with the relevant SubPro Final Report recommendations and IDN EPDP Phase 1 Final Report recommendations?
Yes