Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Ce contenu est uniquement disponible en
The proposed Transition Article addresses a practical issue that has developed around overlapping review cycles and repeated deferrals. Providing a structured and time-bound approach to pausing Specific Reviews offers more clarity than continuing with case-by-case decisions.
The effectiveness of this approach will depend on how the pause period is managed. Clear progress milestones and periodic updates would help ensure that the community can track how the ongoing discussions are advancing toward a workable long-term framework.
The staggered restart of reviews is a sensible approach to avoid recreating the same operational challenges. At the same time, it is important to ensure that delays do not reduce attention to security, stability, and resiliency considerations while the broader review process is being reconsidered.
Overall, the proposal is a practical step, but its success will depend on transparency during the pause and a clearly defined path for resuming reviews in a sustainable way.
This submission supports the general direction of the proposed Transition Article as a more structured and transparent approach to managing the current review backlog. It highlights the importance of clear progress tracking during the pause period and maintaining focus on security, stability, and accountability while a long-term review model is being developed.