Logo
ICANN
ICANN
Filtered Search

Are you sure you want to sign out from http://www.icann.org?

If you want to sign out from both http://www.icann.org and ICANN Account, click here.

Public Comment

Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.

Ce contenu est uniquement disponible en

  • English

Name: ABRAHAM SELBY
Date: 11 Oct 2024
Affiliation: Pan African Youth Ambassadors for Internet Governance
Email: [email protected]
Original Public Comment: Proposed Internet Coordination Policy 2 (ICP-2) Version 2 Principles
1) Do you agree with the Authority principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Strongly Agree

Please share any additional comments you have on this principle:

The authority and amendment process outlined provide a clear decision-making pathway between ICANN and the RIRs, ensuring that changes are collaborative. However, to strengthen accountability, it may be beneficial to include a formal mechanism for documenting and publishing the consultation process and outcomes with each RIR.

2) Do you agree with the Amendment principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree

Please share any additional comments you have on this principle:

The rectification provision is well-drafted, allowing flexibility for RIRs to align their policies with ICP-2. To enhance clarity, it would be helpful to specify the criteria for determining a "reasonable" grace period, ensuring that this flexibility is balanced with timely compliance.

3) Do you agree with the Rectification principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Strongly Agree
4) Do you agree with the Coverage principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Strongly Agree

Please share any additional comments you have on this principle:

The principle of ensuring global coverage is essential for equitable internet resource management. I suggest incorporating language that emphasizes the need for proactive measures by RIRs to address underserved and emerging regions to prevent any service gaps.

5) Do you agree with the Service Region principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree

Please share any additional comments you have on this principle:

The guideline for service regions to cover large, multinational areas without overlap is appropriate. It may also be useful to establish a periodic review mechanism to assess whether geopolitical changes or emerging needs necessitate any adjustments in service region boundaries.

6) Do you agree with the Recognition principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree

Please share any additional comments you have on this principle:

The requirements for recognition, operation, and derecognition of RIRs are well-defined. To enhance transparency, it would be beneficial to develop a public audit or review process for Candidate RIRs seeking recognition, ensuring that stakeholders in the proposed region are fully aware and supportive of the process.

7) Do you agree with the Operation principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Strongly Agree

Please share any additional comments you have on this principle:

The emphasis on community support and commitment is commendable. However, there could be more detailed guidelines on how Candidate RIRs demonstrate community engagement and financial support to ensure consistency in evaluation criteria.

8) Do you agree with the Derecognition principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree

Please share any additional comments you have on this principle:

For derecognition, clear documentation of the non-compliance issues and opportunities for remediation should be outlined, providing an RIR with a transparent pathway for corrective action before final decisions are made.

9) Do you agree with the Community Support principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree
10) Do you agree with the Community Commitment principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree
11) Do you agree with the Independence principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree
12) Do you agree with the Not-for-Profit principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Strongly Agree
13) Do you agree with the Corporate Governance principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Strongly Agree
14) Do you agree with the Member-Controlled principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree
15) Do you agree with the Community-Driven principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Strongly Agree
16) Do you agree with the Neutrality principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Strongly Agree
17) Do you agree with the Transparency principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Strongly Agree
18) Do you agree with the Audit principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree
19) Do you agree with the Service principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree
20) Do you agree with the Continuity principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree

Please share any additional comments you have on this principle:

The continuity and anti-capture provisions are essential. I recommend adding explicit criteria for monitoring ecosystem stability, including indicators or triggers that would prompt collaborative actions among RIRs to address potential risks.

21) Do you agree with the Anti-Capture principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Neutral
22) Do you agree with the Ecosystem Stability principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree

Please share any additional comments you have on this principle:

The focus on providing reliable, secure, and standardized services is critical for maintaining global consistency. To enhance cross-RIR compatibility, it might be advantageous to establish a collaborative forum for RIRs to share best practices, update protocols, and troubleshoot emerging technical issues collectively.

23) Do you agree with the Remedial Bias principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree
24) Do you agree with the Handoff principle as set forth in the Proposed ICP-2 (v2) Principles document?
Agree

Please share any additional comments you have on this principle:

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback on the Proposed Internet Coordination Policy 2 (ICP-2) Version 2 Principles. I appreciate the comprehensive approach taken in addressing the key areas of Governance, RIR Ecosystem, and RIR Operations.

Please provide any other feedback you may have about the Proposed ICP-2 v2 Principles.

Overall, the ICP-2 Version 2 Principles document provides a robust framework for internet coordination. With these enhancements, the policy can better address emerging challenges and continue supporting a stable, inclusive, and transparent RIR ecosystem.

Thank you for considering my feedback. I look forward to the continued evolution of this important policy.