Logo
ICANN
ICANN
Filtered Search

Are you sure you want to sign out from http://www.icann.org?

If you want to sign out from both http://www.icann.org and ICANN Account, click here.

Public Comment

Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.

Ce contenu est uniquement disponible en

  • English

Name: Sarah Wyld
Date: 16 Sep 2024
Affiliation: RrSG
Email: [email protected]
Original Public Comment: Draft ICANN Strategic Plan and Operating Plan Framework for FY26-30
1. How well does the vision statement align with your expectations or the needs of the community?
Very well
1. Are the strategic objectives clearly stated and easy to understand?
Yes
2. Do the strategic objectives adequately address the key issues and challenges facing ICANN?
Yes
3. Are there any additional strategic objectives that need to be added, removed, or modified?
No
1. Are the strategic goals clearly defined and aligned with the strategic objectives?
Yes
2. Is the breakdown of strategic objectives into strategic goals helpful to understand how the objectives will be achieved?
Yes
3. Are there any strategic goals that need to be added, removed, or modified?
No
1. Are the strategies provided for each strategic goal clear and actionable?
Yes
2. Are the strategies appropriate and effective for achieving the strategic goals?
Yes
3. Are the progress indicators associated with each strategy adequate for tracking progress?
Yes
4. Do the strategic risks identified for each strategy seem comprehensive and realistic?
Yes
5. Do you have any suggestions for additional strategies, progress indicators, or improvements to the existing ones?
No
1. Are the key activities outlined in the operating plan clearly defined and understandable?
Yes
2. Do you agree with the phasing approach for each strategy?
Yes
3. Are any key activities too ambitious or unrealistic?
No
4. Are there any strategies that are not adequately addressed in the Operating Plan?
No
5. Are there any overlaps or redundancies in the proposed key activities that could be streamlined?
No
1. Overall, how satisfied are you with the draft Strategic Plan?
Very Satisfied
2. Overall, how satisfied are you with the draft Operating Plan?
Very Satisfied
4. Other General Comments

The Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the ICANN Draft FY26-30 Strategic Plan and Operating Plan Framework.  

In the Draft Operating Framework for Fiscal Years 2026-2030, the RrSG especially supports the specific Policy and Advice Development areas that are flagged for strategic intensity and higher attention. Reducing complexity and incentivising active participation will certainly benefit the work of the ICANN Community and the stability of the multistakeholder model. 

We stand ready to work with ICANN and the Community in developing and implementing improvements to mitigate the identified challenges, and ensuring that our policy development work is accessible to all while meeting timelines and completing work in a reasonable manner. 

The RrSG has been particularly focused on effective communications, providing a series of “Explainer” documents to assist with implementing the new Registration Data Policy as well as other resources and guidance on our website. We similarly support ICANN’s efforts to create materials focused on the benefit of the multistakeholder model of Internet governance.  

Financial stability is of critical importance to the ICANN community, and so the RrSG cautiously supports the plan to reevaluate ICANN’s funding structure and implement cost control measures. Further, the RrSG reviewed the Draft FY26-30 Strategic Plan and has not identified areas of concern. 


Sincerely,


Ashley Heineman

Registrar Stakeholder Group Chair