|
Evaluation of Concepts
RegistryPro shall provide the following reports and related data to ICANN
for use in its proof of concept evaluation. Such reports shall be provided
according to the schedule described herein during the Term of the Registry
Agreement. RegistryPro shall provide the reports in hard copy and, to
the extent feasible, in a common character-mapped electronic form.
Capitalized terms shall have the meanings defined in the Registry Agreement
and its Appendices. As used in this Appendix U, the term "Authorized
Registrar" refers to a registrar accredited by ICANN for the .pro
TLD that has entered into, and has currently in effect, the Registry-Registrar
Agreement (Appendix F).
The reports provided by RegistryPro as described in this Appendix shall
be subject to confidentiality restrictions according to categories described
in Section 12.
1. Concept: Procedures for Maintaining Registry Stability
and Fairness to Customers in the Launch of TLD Restricted to Professional
Names
1.1 Sunrise Period Effectiveness - within
120 days after the end of the Sunrise Period for the each .pro sub-domain
("PS-SLD"), RegistryPro shall provide the following information
and reports to ICANN.
1.1.1 Total number of Sunrise Period registrations
by day.
1.1.2 Total number of Sunrise Period registrations
by week.
1.1.3 Total number of Sunrise Period registrations
with registrant addresses in the regions described below:
1.1.3.1 Africa;
1.1.3.2 Asia Pacific
1.1.3.3 Europe;
1.1.3.4 Latin America/Caribbean; and
1.1.3.5 North America.
1.1.4 Total number of Authorized Registrars
qualified to submit registrations each week of the Sunrise Period.
1.1.5 Total number of Registered Names
registered during the Sunrise Period, divided according to the sponsoring
Authorized Registrar.
1.1.6 A summary of the complaints received
from Authorized Registrars regarding the Registry Operator's operation
of the Sunrise Period.
1.1.7 A description of significant technical
difficulties encountered in operating during the Sunrise Period.
1.1.8 Registry Operator's assessment of
whether the Sunrise Evaluation Period was useful.
1.1.9 A tabulation of the number of Sunrise
Period registrations of various terms in years, broken down by Authorized
Registrar.
1.1.10 A report detailing the modifications
and adjustments to the Registry Database or Sunrise registration procedures
during the Sunrise Evaluation Period.
1.2 Dispute Resolution Mechanism - within
120 days after the last day to make Sunrise Challenges for any PS-SLD,
RegistryPro shall provide the following information and reports to ICANN.
1.2.1 A statement of the total number
of Sunrise Challenges submitted.
1.2.2 A tabulation of the number of names
subject to multiple Sunrise Challenges (i.e. x names were subject
to exactly two challenges, y names were subject to exactly three challenges,
etc.), other than challenges rejected for non-payment.
1.2.3 A tabulation of how many names sponsored
by each Authorized Registrar were subject to at least one Sunrise
Challenge.
1.2.4 A tabulation, broken down by sponsoring
Authorized Registrar, of the number of names subject to successful
Sunrise Challenge.
1.2.5 A tabulation, broken down by country
of the trademark or service mark registration offered by the registrant,
of the number of successful and unsuccessful Sunrise Challenges.
1.2.6 A tabulation, broken down by sponsoring
Authorized Registrar, of the number of names involved in challenges
where the registrant failed to submit any materials within the period
of time provided by the Sunrise Challenge for response to a challenge.
1.2.7 A tabulation, broken down by the
region of the registrant's address as described below, of the number
of names subject to successful Sunrise Challenge:
1.2.7.1 Africa;
1.2.7.2 Asia Pacific
1.2.7.3 Europe;
1.2.7.4 Latin America/Caribbean; and
1.2.7.5 North America.
1.2.8 A tabulation, broken down by the
region of the successful challenger's address as described below,
of the number of names subject to successful Sunrise Challenge:
1.2.8.1 Africa;
1.2.8.2 Asia Pacific
1.2.8.3 Europe;
1.2.8.4 Latin America/Caribbean; and
1.2.8.5 North America.
1.2.9 A tabulation of the number of successful
Sunrise Challengers that did not register the challenged name, broken
down by priority of the Challenger (i.e. x first-priority Challengers
chose not to register the challenged name; y second priority Challengers
were offered the opportunity to, but did not, register the challenged
name, etc.).
1.2.10 A summary of the complaints received
from registrars regarding the Sunrise Challenge mechanism.
1.2.11 A description of significant technical
difficulties encountered in connection with the Sunrise Challenge
mechanism.
1.2.12 A written report detailing RegistryPro's
evaluation of the overall effectiveness of the Sunrise Challenge.
1.2.13 A tabulation, broken down by sponsoring
Authorized Registrar, of the number of Sunrise registrations that
were subject to the Qualification Challenges (see Section II of Appendix
M).
1.2.14 A statement of the total number
of Qualification Challenges filed during the Sunrise Period.
1.3 Registry Live Effectiveness - within 120
days after the Registry Live Launch, for each PS-SLD, respectively,
RegistryPro shall provide the following information and reports to ICANN.
1.3.1 Total number of domain name registrations
resolved into the DNS thirty days after launch.
1.3.2 Total number of domain name registrations
resolved into the DNS thirty days after launch, broken down by the
registrant's address in the regions described below:
1.3.2.1 Africa;
1.3.2.2 Asia Pacific;
1.3.2.3 Europe;
1.3.2.4 Latin America/Caribbean; and
1.3.2.5 North America.
1.3.3 Total number of Authorized Registrars
qualified to submit domain name registrations during the thirty days
after launch.
1.3.4 Total number of domain names under
sponsorship of each Authorized Registrar thirty days after launch.
1.3.5 A summary of the complaints received
from Authorized Registrars regarding the launch.
1.3.6 A description of significant technical
difficulties encountered in operating during the launch.
1.4 Effectiveness of Staggered, Multiple Launches.
No later than one month after the anniversary date after the Commencement-of-Service
Date, RegistryPro shall provide the following information and reports
to ICANN.
1.4.1 A statement of the launch dates
for each PS-SLD launched during the period of this report.
1.4.2 A summary of the complaints received
from registrars regarding the launch of each PS-SLD.
1.4.3 A summary of the complaints received
from registrants regarding the launch of each PS-SLD.
1.4.4 A description of significant technical
difficulties encountered in the launch of each PS-SLD.
1.4.5 A written report detailing RegistryPro's
evaluation of the overall effectiveness of multiple launches of the
.pro PS-SLDs.
1.5 Miscellaneous.
1.5.1 Within 30 days after the first anniversary
of the Commencement-of -Service Date, provide a tabulation of the
number of Sunrise Period registrations that were transferred to another
registrant during each month after the Commencement-of-Service Date.
1.5.2 Within 30 days of learning of any
lawsuit that has been filed concerning the start-up activities in
.pro, identify the lawsuit and provide a copy of the complaint or
describe its allegations.
2. Concept: Procedures for Minimizing Abusive Domain
Name Registration Practices
No later than 180 days after the Commencement-of-Service Date, RegistryPro
shall provide to ICANN a Proof-of-Concept Report on Minimizing Abusive
Registration Practices, with the following information.
2.1 Provide a written report detailing the
effectiveness of Digital Credentials in limiting abusive registration
practices. Include such items as lessons learned and methods of improvement.
2.2 Provide a written report detailing the
effectiveness of the Sunrise Period registration minimum term in limiting
abusive registration practices. Include such items as lessons learned
and methods of improvement.
2.3 Provide a written report detailing the
effectiveness of each of the Manual, Toolkit, and Competitive Toolkit
Verification procedures in limiting abusive registration practices.
Include such items as lessons learned and methods of improvement.
3. Concept: Introducing a Professional Use TLD as
a Means of Effective Competition with a Dominant, Well-Financed TLD such
as .com
No later than one month after each anniversary date after the Commencement-of-Service
Date, RegistryPro shall provide to ICANN an Annual Proof-of-Concept Report
on Effectiveness of Competition, with the following information:
3.1 Marketing and Outreach Efforts
3.1.1 Total RegistryPro expenditures for
marketing and outreach through professional associations and similar
bodies the .pro TLD, broken down by calendar quarter ending in the
year to which the report relates and by the region where the expenditure
was made:
3.1.1.1 Africa;
3.1.1.2 Asia Pacific
3.1.1.3 Europe;
3.1.1.4 Latin America/Caribbean; and
3.1.1.5 North America.
3.1.2 Types of marketing media and outreach
utilized by RegistryPro, broken down by calendar quarter ending in
the year to which the report relates.
3.1.3 Total expenditure for each marketing
media and outreach provided above, broken down by calendar quarter
ending in the year to which the report relates.
3.1.4 (For the first annual report:) Provide
a breakdown of marketing and outreach expenditures during the Sunrise
Period for the following global regions:
3.1.4.1 Africa;
3.1.4.2 Asia Pacific
3.1.4.3 Europe;
3.1.4.4 Latin America/Caribbean; and
3.1.4.5 North America.
3.1.5 Total annual marketing expenditures.
3.2 Report by Quarter - Total number of Authorized
Registrars registering domain names in the TLD, broken down by PS-SLD.
3.2.1 Total number of Authorized Registrars
qualified to register domain names in each PS-SLD, broken down on
a quarterly basis (include a geographic breakdown by global region).
3.2.2 Total number of Authorized Registrars
newly qualified to register domain names in each PS-SLD broken down
on a quarterly basis (include a geographic breakdown by global region).
3.2.3 Total number of Authorized Registrars
qualified to register domain names in PS-SLD who were terminated broken
down on a quarterly basis (include a geographic breakdown by global
region).
3.2.4 Describe the reason for each termination
discussed above.
3.2.5 Total number of registrations from
each PS-SLD under management by each Authorized Registrar, broken
down by quarterly basis.
3.3 Number of initial registrations during
each calendar month ending in the year to which the report relates,
broken down by PS-SLD.
3.4 Number of renewals during each calendar
month ending in the year to which the report relates, broken down by
PS-SLD.
3.5 Number of transfers of registrations between
sponsoring registrars during each calendar month ending in the year
to which the report relates, broken down by PS-SLD.
3.6 Provide the geographic breakdown of registrants
by global region, for each PS-SLD.:
3.6.1 Africa;
3.6.2 Asia Pacific
3.6.3 Europe;
3.6.4 Latin America/Caribbean; and
3.6.5 North America.
3.7 Total domain names expiring and not renewed
during each calendar month ending in the year to which the report relates,
broken down by PS-SLD.
3.8 Average term of new registrations during
each calendar month ending in the year to which the report relates,
broken down by PS-SLD.
3.9 Average term of renewals during each calendar
month ending in the year to which the report relates, broken down by
PS-SLD.
4. Concept: Adding a Professional Name TLD Will Result
in an Expansion and Globalization of the Effective Namespace, Rather than
Wasteful Duplication of Registrations
Sunrise Report - within 120 days after the end of the Sunrise Evaluation
Period, RegistryPro shall provide to ICANN an "Expansion of the DNS"
report with the following elements:
4.1 Total number of duplicate registrations
(i.e. same name) with each of the following TLDs during the Sunrise
Period:
4.1.1 .com;
4.1.2 .net;
4.1.3 .org;
4.1.4 .us; and
4.1.5 .co.uk.
For the purposes of this Subsection, a "duplicate registration"
is a Registered Name (within .pro) in which the third-level label is
identical to a second-level label in the .com, .net, .org or .us TLDs,
or to a third-level label in the .co.uk TLD.
4.2 An estimate of the percentage of such
duplicate registrations registered to the same registrant.
4.3 The percentage of such duplicate registrations
sharing at least one nameserver with respect to each of the five domains
listed in 4.1.1 to 4.1.5.
4.4 Total number of domain names under management
during the Sunrise Period with registrant addresses in the regions described
below:
4.4.1 Africa;
4.4.2 Asia Pacific
4.4.3 Europe;
4.4.4 Latin America/Caribbean; and
4.4.5 North America.
4.5 Number of Authorized Registrars, broken
down by global region, registering domain names during the Sunrise Period:
4.5.1 Africa;
4.5.2 Asia Pacific
4.5.3 Europe;
4.5.4 Latin America/Caribbean;
and
4.5.5 North America.
Annual Reports - No later than one month after each anniversary date
after the Commencement-of-Service Date, RegistryPro shall provide to ICANN
an "Expansion of the DNS" report with the following elements:
4.6 Total number of duplicate registrations
(i.e. same name) with each of the following TLDs at the end of each
calendar month ending in the year to which the report relates.
4.6.1 .com;
4.6.2 .net;
4.6.3 .org;
4.6.4 .us; and
4.6.5 .co.uk.
For the purposes of this Subsection, a "duplicate registration"
is a Registered Name (within .pro) in which the third-level label is
identical to a second-level label in the .com, .net, .org or .us TLDs,
or to a third-level label in the .co.uk TLD.
4.7 An estimate of the percentage of such
duplicate registrations registered to the same registrant.
4.8 The percentage of such duplicate registrations
sharing .at least one nameserver with respect to each of the five domains
listed in 4.6.1 to 4.6.5.
4.9 Total number of domain names under management
Post Live Launch on a quarterly basis with registrant addresses in the
regions described below:
4.9.1 Africa;
4.9.2 Asia Pacific
4.9.3 Europe;
4.9.4 Latin America/Caribbean; and
4.9.5 North America.
4.10 Number of Authorized Registrars, broken
down by global region, registering domain names post Live Launch Start
Date:
4.10.1 Africa;
4.10.2 Asia Pacific
4.10.3 Europe;
4.10.4 Latin America/Caribbean; and
4.10.5 North America.
5. Concept: Registry Services Can Effectively Be Provided
by a Registry Operator Relying on an Independent Advisory Board
5.1 Ability to Effectively Operate the Registry.
Annual Report - No later than one month after each anniversary date
after the Commencement-of-Service Date, RegistryPro shall provide to
ICANN a written report with the following elements:
5.1.1 Total number of registrations under
management during each calendar month ending in the year to which
the report relates.
5.1.2 Total number of Authorized Registrars
during each calendar month ending in the year to which the report
relates.
5.1.3 Total value of SLA Credits to Authorized
Registrar Registrars during each calendar month ending in the year
to which the report relates.
5.1.4 Total SLA Credits awarded to each
Authroized Registrar during each calendar month ending in the year
to which the report relates.
5.2 Ability to Attract and Maintain Registrars
- within 180 days after the Commencement-of-Service Date, RegistryPro
shall provide the following information and reports to ICANN.
5.2.1 Total number of ICANN-Accredited
Registrars who participated in the Registry Operational Test and Evaluation
process.
5.2.2 Total number of ICANN-Accredited
Registrars who failed the Operational Test and Evaluation process.
5.2.3 Total number of ICANN-Accredited
Registrars re-tested for the Operational Test and Evaluation process.
5.2.4 A summary of complaints received
from ICANN-Accredited Registrars regarding the Operational Test and
Evaluation process.
5.2.5 Provide a written report detailing
the effectiveness of the Operational Test and Evaluation process.
Include such items as lessons learned and methods of improvement.
5.3 Effectiveness of Advisory Board - within
180 days after the Commencement-of-Service Date, RegistryPro shall provide
an initial Advisory Board Registry Report with the following information
and reports to ICANN. Thereafter, no later than one year after the anniversary
date of the initial report, RegistryPro shall provide to ICANN an Advisory
Board Registry Report.
5.3.1 A statement of the number of members
on the .pro TLD Advisory Board, broken down by the professional category
each member represents (if any).
5.3.2 A statement of the number of Sub-Advisory
Boards, if such are established, broken down by professional category
and date formed.
5.3.2.1 Identify each member of each
Sub-Advisory Board.
5.3.2.2 Identify the country and
geographic region of each member of each Sub-Advisory Board.
5.3.3 A statement of the number of times
and dates the Advisory Board and each subsidiary Advisory Board met
in person, by video-conferencing, or by telephone during the period
of the report.
5.3.4 A statement of the written notices,
if any, sent by the Advisory Board to the RegistryPro Managing Board
regarding alleged violations of restrictions.
5.3.4.1 For each written notice described
above, provide a summary of the alleged violation(s).
5.3.4.2 For each written notice described
above, summarize the actions taken, if any, to resolve the alleged
violation(s).
5.3.5 List the number and type of additional
professional PS-SLDs, including second level registrations in the
.pro domain, proposed by the Advisory Board during the period of this
report.
5.3.6 List the number and type of additional
qualifications for the existing professional PS-SLDs proposed by the
Advisory Board during the period of this report.
5.3.7 A written report regarding the RegistryPro
Global Partnership of Associations ("RGPA") to include:
5.3.7.1 A list of members of the RGPA;
5.3.7.2 A list of the professional
categories, broken down by each member, represented by the RGPA
(i.e. doctors are represented by x member(s), y member(s), etc
);
and
5.3.7.3 A breakdown of the country
and geographic region of each member.
5.3.8 A written report detailing RegistryPro's
evaluation of the overall effectiveness of the Advisory Board and
each Sub-Advisory Board.
5.4 Effectiveness of Community Refund Program
- No later than one month after the anniversary date after the Commencement-of-Service
Date, RegistryPro shall provide the following information and reports:
5.4.1 Total amount of Community Refund
distribution for the period of this report.
5.4.2 Total amount of Community Refund
distribution provided for each of the following:
5.4.2.1 Support of DNSO;
5.4.2.2 Support for additional arbitration
mechanisms;
5.4.2.3 Consumer-focused domain name
education programs;
5.4.2.4 Support for ICANN policies;
and
5.4.2.5 Bridging the Digital Divide.
5.4.3 A list of each party receiving Community
Refund proceeds and the amount received for the period of this report.
6. Concept: Mechanisms in a Chartered Registry for
Ensuring that all Registrars Are Treated Fairly
Annual Reports - No later than one month after each anniversary date
after the Commencement-of-Service Date, RegistryPro shall provide to ICANN
a Fair-Treatment Report with the following elements:
6.1 A description of every known violation or
alleged violation of the Code of Conduct during each calendar month
ending in the year to which the report relates.
6.2 Total number of complaints received by RegistryPro
from registrars regarding services provided by RegistryPro.
6.2.1 Identify and categorize the types
of complaints received from Authorized Registrars.
6.2.2 List corrective actions, if any, in
response to the categorized complaints.
6.3 Total number of Authorized Registrars restricted
from further registrations for non-payment of registration fees.
6.4 Total number of Authorized Registrars restricted
from further registrations for non-compliance with RegistryPro policies,
including verification requirements.
7. Concept: Use of Centralized Registry-Level Whois
to Enhance Transparency and Accountability in Domain-Name Registrations
Annual Reports - No later than one month after each anniversary date
after the Commencement-of-Service Date, RegistryPro shall provide to ICANN
a Whois Report with the following elements:
7.1 Total number of complaints received from
registrants regarding Whois information during each calendar month ending
in the year to which the report relates.
7.2 Total number of complaints received from
Authorized Registrars regarding Whois service during each calendar month
ending in the year to which the report relates.
7.3 Total number of complaints received from
third parties regarding Whois information during each calendar month
ending in the year to which the report relates.
7.4 (For the first annual report:) Total Whois
query volume during the Sunrise Period.
7.5 Total number of Whois queries during each
calendar month ending in the year to which the report relates.
7.6 Expanded Query-Based Searchability (as
described in Section 5 of Appendix G):
7.6.1 Total number of subscribers (include
a geographic breakdown by country and global region).
7.6.2 Total number of queries during each
calendar month ending in the year to which the report relates.
7.6.3 Total number of queries broken down
by subscribers during each calendar month ending in the year to which
the report relates.
7.7 Privacy Complaints:
7.7.1 Total number of complaints relating
to privacy issues during each calendar month ending in the year to
which the report relates.
7.7.2 Identify and categorize types of
privacy complaints.
8. Concept: Capital Requirements in Operating a TLD
Restricted to Professional Use
Annual Reports - No later than one month after each anniversary date
after the Commencement-of-Service Date, RegistryPro shall provide to ICANN
a Funding Requirements Report with the following elements:
8.1 Total expenditures during the Sunrise
Period.
8.2 Total expenditures during the period
after Live Launch on a quarterly basis.
8.3 Breakdown of expenditures for the following
categories:
8.3.1 Marketing;
8.3.2 Software; and
8.3.3 Hardware.
8.4 Provide a list of the employee positions
hired during the following periods:
8.4.1 Pre-Sunrise Period;
8.4.2 Sunrise Period; and
8.4.3 Period after Live Launch on a quarterly
basis.
9. Concept: Deployment of a Digital Credentials Requirement
will Enhance Utility of the DNS
Annual Reports - no later than one month after each anniversary date
after the Commencement-of-Service Date, RegistryPro shall provide to ICANN
an "Enhancement of DNS Utility" report with the following elements
as applicable:
9.1 Total number of Commercial Certificate
Authorities ("CCAs").
9.2 List each CCA categorized by the following
regions described below:
9.2.1 Africa;
9.2.2 Asia Pacific;
9.2.3 Europe;
9.2.4 Latin America/Caribbean; and
9.2.5 North America.
9.3 Total number of CCAs authorized to issue
digital credentials that were terminated (include a geographic breakdown
by global region).
9.4 Total number of CCAs terminations that
were appealed (include a geographic breakdown by global region).
9.5 Describe the reason for each termination
above.
9.6 A description of significant technical
difficulties encountered in utilizing digital credentials.
9.7 A summary of the complaints received from
Authorized Registrars regarding the digital credential.
9.8 A written evaluation of the overall effectiveness
of digital credentials and CCAs, focusing on operational challenges
encountered, if any, the prevalence of use by users and user applications
of digital credentials, and the added utility provided by the requirement
for digital credentials in the .pro TLD .
10. Concept: Registrations Restrictions Can be Implemented
by a Registry Operator in a Cost Effective and Timely Manner
10.1 UDRP Violations - within 180 days after
the Commencement-of-Service Date, RegistryPro shall provide an initial
report with the following information and reports to ICANN. Thereafter,
no later than one year after the anniversary date of the initial report,
RegistryPro shall provide the following information and reports to ICANN.
10.1.1 A statement of the total number
of UDRP challenges filed.
10.1.2 A tabulation of the number of
names subject to multiple UDRP challenges (i.e., x names were subject
to exactly two challenges, y names were subject to exactly three challenges,
etc.).
10.1.3 A statement of how many names
sponsored by each Authorized Registrar were subject to at least one
UDRP challenge.
10.1.4 A breakdown by country of the
registrant of the number of successful and unsuccessful UDRP challenges.
10.1.5 A statement, broken down by sponsoring
Authorized Registrar, of the number of names involved in UDRP challenges
where the registrant failed to submit any materials after notification
of challenge.
10.1.6 A statement, broken down by the
region of the registrant's address as described below, of the number
of names subject to successful UDRP challenges:
10.1.6.1 Africa;
10.1.6.2 Asia Pacific;
10.1.6.3 Europe;
10.1.6.4 Latin America/Caribbean;
and
10.1.6.5 North America.
10.1.7 A statement, broken down by the
region of the successful challenger's address as described below,
of the number of names subject to successful UDRP challenges:
10.1.7.1 Africa;
10.1.7.2 Asia Pacific;
10.1.7.3 Europe;
10.1.7.4 Latin America/Caribbean;
and
10.1.7.5 North America.
10.1.8 A statement of the number of successful
UDRP challengers that did not register the challenged name, broken
down by priority of the challenger (i.e. x first-priority challengers
chose not to register the challenged name; y second priority challengers
were offered the opportunity to, but did not, register the challenged
name, etc.).
10.1.9 A summary of the complaints received
from RegistryPro Registrars regarding the UDRP.
10.2 Qualification Challenges - within 120
days after the Commencement-of-Service Date, RegistryPro shall provide
the following information and reports to ICANN. Thereafter, no later
than one year after the anniversary date of the initial report, RegistryPro
shall provide the following information and reports to ICANN.
10.2.1 A tabulation of the total number
of Qualification Challenges filed, broken down by PS-SLD.
10.2.2 A tabulation of the number of
names subject to multiple Qualification Challenges (i.e., x names
were subject to exactly two challenges, y names were subject to exactly
three challenges, etc.), broken down by PS-SLD.
10.2.3 A breakdown for each PS-SLD of
the Qualification Challenges by the type of verification utilized
to qualify a registrant.
10.2.4 A breakdown for each PS-SLD of
the Qualification Challenges by whether the challenge was prompted
by a third party, the sponsoring Authroized Registrar, or RegistryPro.
10.2.5 A tabulation, broken down by PS-SLD,
of how many names sponsored by each Authorized Registrar were subject
to at least one Qualification Challenge.
10.2.6 A breakdown by country of the
registration sponsored by each Authorized Registrar and by PS-SLD
of the number of successful and unsuccessful Qualification Challenges.
10.2.7 A tabulation, broken down by sponsoring
Authorized Registrar and PS-SLD, of the number of names involved in
Qualification Challenges where the Registrant failed to submit any
materials within the time period allotted by the Qualification Challenge
Providers for responding to a challenge.
10.2.8 A tabulation, broken down by the
region of the registrant's address as described below, of the number
of names subject to successful Qualification Challenges:
10.2.8.1 Africa;
10.2.8.2 Asia Pacific;
10.2.8.3 Europe;
10.2.8.4 Latin America/Caribbean;
and
10.2.8.5 North America.
10.2.9 A statement, broken down by the
region of the successful challenger's address as described below,
of the number of names subject to successful Qualification Challenges:
10.2.9.1 Africa;
10.2.9.2 Asia Pacific;
10.2.9.3 Europe;
10.2.9.4 Latin America/Caribbean;
and
10.2.9.5 North America.
10.2.10 A statement of the number of
successful challengers that did not register the challenged name,
10.2.11 A summary of the complaints
received from Authroized Registrars regarding the Qualification Challenge,
including complaints about any specific Qualification Challenge Providers.
10.2.12 A description of significant
technical difficulties encountered in connection with the Qualification
Challenge.
10.2.13 A written evaluation of the
overall effectiveness of the Qualification Challenge.
10.3 Registration Restrictions - within 120
days after the Commencement-of-Service Date, RegistryPro shall provide
the following information and reports to ICANN. Thereafter, no later
than one year after the anniversary date of the initial report, RegistryPro
shall provide the following information and reports to ICANN.
10.3.1 Total number of Authorized Registrars
verifying registrant information by utilizing Manual Registration
Verification procedures (include a geographic breakdown by global
region and a PS-SLD breakdown).
10.3.2 Total number of Authorized Registrars
verifying registrant information by utilizing the RegistryPro Verification
Toolkit (include a geographic breakdown by global region and a PS-SLD
breakdown).
10.3.3 Total number of Authorized Registrars
verifying registrant information by utilizing the Competitive Verification
Toolkit (include a geographic breakdown by global region and a PS-SLD
breakdown).
10.3.4 Total number of Registered Names
registered utilizing the Manual Verification procedure, broken down
by Authorized Registrar and PS-SLD.
10.3.5 Total number of Registered Names
registered utilizing the RegistryPro Toolkit Verification, broken
down by Authorized Registrar and PS-SLD.
10.3.6 Total number of domain names registered
utilizing the Competitive Toolkit Verification, broken down by Authorized
Registrar and PS-SLD.
10.3.7 Total number of successful registrations
utilizing Toolkit or Competitive Toolkit Verifications, respectively,
whereby the registrant was a member of an Advisory Board, Sub-Advisory
Board or RGPA association.
10.3.8 A summary of the complaints received
from Authorized Registrars regarding the Manual Verification process.
10.3.9 A summary of the complaints received
from Authorized Registrars regarding the Toolkit or Competitive Toolkit
Verification, respectively.
10.3.10 A description of significant technical
problems encountered in operating the RegistryPro Toolkit Verification.
10.3.11 A description of significant technical
problems encountered in operating the Competitive Toolkit Verification.
10.3.12 A statement of the total number
of registrants notified pursuant to the Periodic Verification process
that they no longer qualify for the professional category of their
original or renewal registration.
10.3.13 Of those registrants notified,
list the geographic location of the Registrant, the professional category,
the sponsoring RegistryPro Registrar and whether the Periodic Verification
was Manual, RegistryPro Toolkit or Competitive Toolkit.
10.3.14 A summary of the complaints received
from Authroized Registrars regarding the Periodic Verification process.
11. Commercially Reasonable Efforts and Review
Many of the reports to be provided by RegistryPro require access to data
to which RegistryPro may not be privy or which may not be reasonably available
to RegistryPro. Recognizing the importance of the proof of concept:
11.1 RegistryPro shall use commercially reasonable
efforts to obtain all necessary data and complete the required reports
as set forth in this Appendix; and
11.2 In the event RegistryPro is unable through
commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the requisite data to complete
the required reports or the compilation of a specific report proves
unreasonably costly, ICANN shall, to the fullest extent possible, assist
RegistryPro and/or the registry community in obtaining or coordinating
efforts to obtain the data, or alternative data (including as appropriate
data of reduced scope) useful in connection with the proof of concept,
in a less costly way.
12. Confidentiality
The reports provided by RegistryPro as described in this Appendix shall
be subject to confidentiality restrictions according to categories described
in the following table:
|
Category
|
Restrictions
|
|
1
|
May be publicly disclosed by ICANN
18 months after the information is reported to ICANN. |
|
2
|
May be publicly disclosed by ICANN
6 months after the information is reported to ICANN. |
|
3
|
May be publicly disclosed by ICANN 3 months after the last date
to which the information relates. |
|
4
|
No confidentiality restrictions. |
ICANN will use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent public disclosure
prior to the times described in the table above.
RegistryPro shall clearly label all reports and information provided
pursuant to this Appendix with the appropriate confidentiality category
prior to submission to ICANN.
The following table sets forth, for each item in each report, the confidentiality
category (CC) that applies to it:
| Report ID |
Confidentiality Category |
Report ID |
Confidentiality Category |
Report ID |
Confidentiality Category |
Report ID |
Confidentiality Category |
| 1.1.1 |
4 |
2.2 |
3 |
5.3.1 |
4 |
9.8 |
3 |
| 1.1.2 |
4 |
2.3 |
3 |
5.3.2 |
4 |
10.1.1 |
4 |
| 1.1.3.1 -1.1.3.5 |
4 |
3.1.1.1 - 3.1.1.5 |
1 |
5.3.2.1 |
4 |
10.1.2 |
4 |
| 1.1.4 |
4 |
3.1.2 |
1 |
5.3.2.2 |
4 |
10.1.3 |
3 |
| 1.1.5 |
3 |
3.1.3 |
1 |
5.3.3 |
3 |
10.1.4 |
4 |
| 1.1.6 |
3 |
3.1.4.1 - 3.1.4.5 |
1 |
5.3.4 |
2 |
10.1.5 |
4 |
| 1.1.7 |
3 |
3.1.5 |
2 |
5.3.4.1 |
2 |
10.1.6.1 - 10.1.6.5 |
4 |
| 1.1.8 |
4 |
3.2.1 |
4 |
5.3.4.2 |
2 |
10.1.7.1 - 10.1.7.5 |
4 |
| 1.1.9 |
3 |
3.2.2 |
4 |
5.3.5 |
3 |
10.1.8 |
4 |
| 1.1.10 |
4 |
3.2.3 |
4 |
5.3.6 |
3 |
10.1.9 |
4 |
| 1.2.1 |
4 |
3.2.4 |
2 |
5.3.7.1 – 5.3.7.3 |
4 |
10.2.1 |
4 |
| 1.2.2 |
4 |
3.2.5 |
3 |
5.3.8 |
3 |
10.2.2 |
3 |
| 1.2.3 |
2 |
3.3 |
3 |
5.4.1 |
3 |
10.2.3 |
3 |
| 1.2.4 |
2 |
3.4 |
3 |
5.4.2.1- 5.4.2.5 |
3 |
10.2.4 |
3 |
| 1.2.5 |
4 |
3.5 |
3 |
5.4.3 |
3 |
10.2.5 |
3 |
| 1.2.6 |
4 |
3.6.1 - 3.6.5 |
3 |
6.1 |
2 |
10.2.6 |
3 |
| 1.2.7.1 -1.2.7.5 |
4 |
3.7 |
3 |
6.2 |
2 |
10.2.7 |
3 |
| 1.2.8.1 -1.2.8.5 |
4 |
3.8 |
3 |
6.2.1 - 6.2.2 |
2 |
10.2.8.1 - 10.2.8.5 |
4 |
| 1.2.9 |
4 |
3.9 |
3 |
6.3 |
3 |
10.2.9.1 - 10.2.9.5 |
4 |
| 1.2.10 |
2 |
4.1.1 - 4.1.5 |
4 |
6.4 |
2 |
10.2.10 |
4 |
| 1.2.11 |
4 |
4.2 |
4 |
7.1 |
3 |
10.2.11 |
4 |
| 1.2.12 |
4 |
4.3 |
4 |
7.2 |
3 |
10.2.12 |
2 |
| 1.2.13 |
4 |
4.4.1 - 4.4.5 |
4 |
7.3 |
3 |
10.2.13 |
3 |
| 1.2.14 |
4 |
4.5.1 - 4.5.5 |
4 |
7.4 |
3 |
10.3.1 |
4 |
| 1.3.1 |
3 |
4.6.1 - 4.6.5 |
4 |
7.5 |
3 |
10.3.2 |
4 |
| 1.3.2.1 – 1.3.2.5 |
4 |
4.7 |
4 |
7.6.1 – 7.6.3 |
3 |
10.3.3 |
4 |
| 1.3.3 |
4 |
4.8 |
4 |
7.7.1 – 7.7.2 |
2 |
10.3.4 |
4 |
| 1.3.4 |
4 |
4.9.1 - 4.9.5 |
4 |
8.1 |
2 |
10.3.5 |
4 |
| 1.3.5 |
3 |
4.10.1 - 4.10.5 |
4 |
8.2 |
2 |
10.3.6 |
4 |
| 1.3.6 |
3 |
5.1.1 |
3 |
8.3.1 - 8.3.3 |
2 |
10.3.7 |
4 |
| 1.4.1 |
4 |
5.1.2 |
4 |
8.4.1 - 8.3.3 |
2 |
10.3.8 |
2 |
| 1.4.2 |
3 |
5.1.3 |
3 |
9.1 |
4 |
10.3.9 |
2 |
| 1.4.3 |
3 |
5.1.4 |
3 |
9.2.1 - 9.2.5 |
4 |
10.3.10 |
3 |
| 1.4.4 |
3 |
5.2.1 |
4 |
9.3 |
3 |
10.3.11 |
3 |
| 1.4.5 |
3 |
5.2.2 |
4 |
9.4 |
3 |
10.3.12 |
4 |
| 1.5.1 |
4 |
5.2.3 |
4 |
9.5 |
2 |
10.3.13 |
4 |
| 1.5.2 |
4 |
5.2.4 |
3 |
9.6 |
3 |
10.3.14 |
3 |
| 2.1 |
3 |
5.2.5 |
3 |
9.7 |
3 |
|
|
Comments concerning the layout, construction and functionality
of this site
should be sent to webmaster@icann.org.
Page Updated
27-Apr-2002
©2002 The Internet Corporation for
Assigned Names and Numbers. All rights reserved.
|