Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Контент доступен только на следующих языках
Submissions for this Proceeding
Phase 2 Initial Report of the EPDP on Internationalized Domain Names
View this Proceeding
Provide Your Input
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
The Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG) welcomes the opportunity to provide a comment on the Phase 2 Initial Report of the EPDP on Internationalized Domain Names. This is a significant undertaking by the ICANN community and ICANN Org, and the RrSG appreciates the dedication of the team in addressing this important matter.
The RrSG supports the recommendations in the Phase 2 Initial Report. Equitable access to the Internet and participatio...
Submission Summary:
The NCSG expresses its sincere gratitude for the chance to provide feedback and guidance on important ICANN policy matters as such. Our comments seek greater clarity on issues and address potential ambiguities that may confuse readers, especially those who are not used to ICANN's procedures and this particular technical language.
Regular summaries and less technical jargon could enhance readability and ensure that non-experts ...
Submission Summary:
ICANN org appreciates the Internationalized Domain Names Expedited Policy Development Process (IDNs EPDP) Team’s efforts to organize its work in light of the importance of this EPDP to the advancement of a multilingual Internet, and will continue to coordinate closely due to the interactions with other policy and implementation work.
The following input is intended to help the EPDP Team in its continued deliberations in the fo...
Submission Summary:
I found the one mentioned section (C6) to contain incorrect wording.