The ICANN Board of Directors held a regular meeting on 28
June 2002 meeting in Bucharest, Romania, with Directors Vint Cerf
(chairman), Amadeu Abril i Abril, Robert Blokzijl, Ivan Moura Campos,
Lyman Chapin, Jonathan Cohen, Frank Fitzsimmons, Masanobu Katoh, Hans
Kraaijenbrink, Sang-Hyon Kyong, Stuart Lynn, Andy Mueller-Maguhn, Jun
Murai, Alejandro Pisanty, Nii Quaynor, Helmut Schink and Linda S. Wilson
participating. The Board adopted the following resolutions:
Reconsideration
Requests
Resolved [02.71] that the Reconsideration Committee's
Recommendation RC 02-2
is adopted for the reasons stated in that recommendation. The Board
notes that a DNSO task force is currently involved in bottom-up development
of improved policies concerning registration transfers between registrars;
proposals for such improvements should be directed to the task force.
Resolved [02.72] that the Reconsideration Committee's
Recommendation RC 02-3
is adopted for the reasons stated in that recommendation.
MoU for .mw ccTLD
Whereas, negotiators for Malawi Sustainable Development Network Programme
(Malawi SDNP), and ICANN have reached agreement, subject to the ICANN
Board's approval, on the terms of an ICANN-ccTLD Manager Memorandum
of Understanding for the .mw top-level domain according to the model
memorandum of understanding for bilateral situations as posted on
the ICANN web site, with insertion of particulars appropriate to the
.mw top-level domain;
Whereas, the President and General Counsel have presented the ICANN-ccTLD
Manager Memorandum of Understanding to the Board and recommended that
the Board authorize its entry as negotiated;
Resolved [02.73] that the President is authorized
to enter on behalf of ICANN the ICANN-ccTLD Manager Memorandum of Understanding
for .mw as presented to the Board, along with any minor corrections
or adjustments as appropriate;
Resolved [02.74] that, upon signature of the memorandum,
the President is authorized to take such actions as appropriate to implement
it.
Evolution and Reform
Whereas, Stuart Lynn's "President's
Report: The Case for Reform," thoughtfully laid out the need
for constructive change in ICANN structure and processes, and initiated
a very productive dialog throughout the ICANN community;
Whereas, the Board accepted the President's Report as a timely and
important call to action, and then established a Board Evolution
and Reform Committee (ERC) to manage the process of receiving and
evaluating community input on these and related issues;
Whereas, the ERC has since undertaken an intense process of outreach,
consultation, and analysis of suggestions from throughout the community
on how ICANN's structure and processes can be reformed to improve its
effectiveness while preserving its essential character as an open and
transparent non-governmental policy development body;
Whereas, the ERC established various mechanisms for receipt of input
from the ICANN community and the global public interested in these issues,
received and considered a very large number of comments and suggestions
related to these issues, and periodically published Working Papers on
ICANN
Mission and Core Values, ICANN
Structure and the Nominating Committee Concept, and the ICANN
Policy Development Process, along with other documents identifying
possible alternative solutions to the identified issues and seeking
further community input on increasingly specific and detailed proposals
for reform;
Whereas, the ERC most recently published its Blueprint
for Reform, summarizing its work to date and making specific recommendations
for Board action that would create a roadmap for moving forward in the
reform process;
Whereas, the ERC Blueprint offers specific recommendations with respect
to a statement of ICANN's Mission and Core Values, its organization
and structure, the composition and selection of its Board, improvements
in ICANN's policy development process, various measures to improve accountability
of ICANN's structures and procedures, and the need for funding adequate
to carry out ICANN's mission;
Whereas, the public participation of the audience and Board members
in the open forum of the ICANN Board that took place during
its meeting in Bucharest, Romania, on 27 June 2002, provided additional
input and feedback on the proposals contained in the Blueprint;
Whereas, it is now time to move forward with implementation with confidence
that while the Blueprint may not satisfy everyone, it provides the right
foundation on which ICANN can build for the future;
Therefore, it is resolved [02.75] that the Board
adopts and endorses the ERC
Blueprint for Reform, and the broad outlines of ICANN structural
and procedural reform that it contains;
Further resolved [02.76] that the ERC is directed
to oversee further detailed implementation and transition work based
on the Blueprint for Reform, with the continued involvement and participation
of the ICANN community, to report to the Board at its next telephonic
meeting as to its progress and schedule, and to provide its implementation
recommendations to the Board and the community sufficiently prior
to the Shanghai meeting so that the Board can take action at that
meeting;
Further resolved [02.77] that the President is
directed to provide all appropriate assistance and resources to the
ERC and any transition teams or mechanisms that it creates to assist
it in the transition process;
Further resolved [02.78] that the Board takes note
of the importance to the community, as expressed throughout this reform
process and in the Public Forum discussion at the Bucharest meeting,
of the following issues, and instructs the ERC to take due account of
these issues as it moves forward in the implementation process, namely,
the need to:
- devise and incorporate specific measures to ensure, to the extent
feasible, geographic and cultural diversity in all parts of ICANN
structure, which have been key core values of ICANN since its inception,
and remain so today, as expressed in the ERC Blueprint for Reform;
- consider the creation of an At Large Advisory Committee as a potential
vehicle for informed participation in ICANN by the broad user community;
- ensure that the composition and operation of the Nominating Committee
in fact represents a balance among all segments of the Internet community;
- collaborate with critical infrastructure providers and the technical
community to further the establishment of effective working relationships;
and
- ensure that ICANN's policy development processes enhance and promote
a transparent bottom-up process.
Further resolved [02.79] that any further opportunities
for strengthening ICANN's capacity to fulfill its mission that develop
or are identified during the implementation process should be carefully
reviewed and utilized as appropriate;
Further resolved [02.80] that the Board takes note
of all the many different viewpoints that have characterized a very
constructive dialog since the President issued his
Report, and extends its deep appreciation to all the many members
of the ICANN community that cared enough about ICANN to participate
in an extraordinarily thoughtful and serious undertaking. The Board
notes with deep gratitude all the countless hours of volunteer time
selflessly devoted to this process.
Approval of
2002-2003 Budget
Whereas, ICANN's bylaws require that the President shall prepare and
submit to the Board a proposed annual budget of the Corporation for
the next fiscal year;
Whereas, the President, with the endorsement of the Finance Committee
and with the assistance of the Budget Advisory Group, has followed an
open and consultative process in developing the budget, including posting
of a preliminary
budget on 30 March 2002, posting of a proposed
budget on 15 May 2002, submission of on-line comments, and a budget
presentation and discussion at the ICANN
Public Forum in Bucharest on 27 June 2002;
Whereas, the Board has carefully considered the comments received;
Whereas, the President has submitted to the Board a proposed prepared
through that consultative process for FY02-03, commencing 1 July 2002
(the "Proposed
Budget");
Whereas, the Board has reviewed the Proposed Budget and has found that
its adoption is in the best interests of the Corporation;
Resolved [02.81] that the Proposed
Budget is hereby adopted as the annual budget of the Corporation
for the fiscal year beginning 1 July 2002 (as adopted, the "Budget");
and
Further resolved [02.82] that the President is
authorized and directed to implement and carry out the Budget and is
directed to inform the Board of material variances from the Budget.
Redemption Grace
Period
Whereas, ICANN resolution
02.45 authorized the convening of a technical steering group to
develop a concrete proposal for implementation of a Redemption Grace
Period for deleted domain names;
Whereas, the Technical Steering Group's Implementation
Proposal was posted on the ICANN website on 7 June 2002;
Whereas, the proposal called for implementing a Redemption Grace Period
by instituting an extended Delete Pending Period and a new Restore capability,
which will be a new Registry Service for which registry operators will
be able to charge a cost-based service fee;
Whereas, the Redemption Grace Period proposal was discussed and received
broad community support at the ICANN
Public Forum held 27 June 2002 in Bucharest, Romania;
Resolved [02.83] that the President and General
Counsel are authorized to conduct negotiations on behalf of ICANN toward
appropriate revisions to agreements between ICANN and the unsponsored
TLD registry operators to implement the Redemption Grace Period in a
manner consistent with the Technical Steering Group's Implementation
Proposal.
Wait-Listing
Service Proposal
Whereas, on 21 March 2002 VeriSign,
Inc., the operator of the .com and .net registries, requested amendments
to the registry agreements for those top-level domains to allow it to
conduct a twelve-month trial of a proposed wait-listing service (WLS)
to be offered through accredited registrars for an annual fee;
Whereas, in resolution
02.53 the Board requested the Names Council to coordinate within
the DNSO a comprehensive review of issues concerning the deletion of
domain names and possible solutions for those issues and to submit to
the Board a status report on that review, with the status report to
include any recommendations concerning VeriSign's request to modify
the .com and .net agreements to allow it to provide the WLS;
Whereas, the DNSO's Transfers Task Force presented to the Board a status
report giving preliminary findings and recommendations on WLS, but
requiring additional analysis and discussion within the DNSO before
the report is finalized;
Whereas, as contemplated by resolution
02.55 ICANN has received various public comments on the WLS on a
web-based public comment forum;
Whereas, a Public Forum was
held on 27 June 2002 at ICANN's meetings in Bucharest, during which
VeriSign gave a presentation of the WLS in which it constructively proposed
changes to accommodate concerns expressed in community comments; the
DNSO Transfers Task Force summarized its preliminary findings and recommendations;
and several members of the Internet community gave their views on WLS;
Whereas, the Board, although very anxious to ensure that action on
VeriSign's request proceeds without unnecessary delay, believes that
its consideration of the request would be assisted by receiving the
final report of the DNSO's bottom-up consensus-development effort, including
its views on the modifications recently proposed by VeriSign;
Resolved [02.84] that the Names Council is requested
to provide, no later than 26 July 2002, its final recommendations, with
its supporting rationale and any separate positions of DNSO constituencies,
on the VeriSign WLS request (including the modifications made on 27
June 2002), so that the Board may act shortly thereafter.
.org Application
Fees Rebates
Whereas, the Board of Directors at its 22 April 2002 meeting established
a tentative examination fee of US$35,000 in connection with proposals
for transfer of the .org registry;
Whereas, the Board stated that it would finally establish the examination
fee, not to exceed US$35,000, at its Bucharest meeting with rebates
to be made if the final examination fee is less than the tentative examination
fee;
Whereas, the President has analyzed the financial costs in relation
to the revenues actually received, and concluded that the final examination
fee could be set at US$29,000 and still recover anticipated costs;
Whereas, this final examination fee and the revenues derived therefrom
would not provide for any potential litigation costs;
Resolved [02.85] that the Board establishes the
final examination fee to be US$29,000 and instructs the President to
rebate the US$6,000 per applicant.
Executive Search
Committee
Resolved [02.86] that there be, and there hereby
is, effective immediately, established an advisory committee to be named
the "Executive Search Committee," responsible for overseeing
the search for a Chief Executive Officer and other officers as appropriate;
Further resolved [02.87] that Vinton Cerf be, and
hereby is, appointed chair of the Executive Search Committee, and that
Rob Blokzijl, Ivan Moura Campos, Masanobu Katoh, Nii Quaynor, and Linda
Wilson be, and hereby are, appointed members of the Executive Search
Committee.
IDN Committee
Whereas, the ICANN Internationalized Domain
Name (IDN) Committee has completed work on a set of policy papers
relating to the potential introduction of non-ASCII characters to the
DNS, including most recently its discussion papers on Non-ASCII
Top-Level Domain Policy Issues and Registry
Selection Considerations for Non-ASCII Top-Level Domains;
Whereas the IDN Committee has submitted to the Board a Final
Report on its activities, meeting its anticipated deadline of 30 June
2002;
Whereas the IDN Committee's documents have generated and benefited
from significant substantive feedback from various interested organizations,
experts, and users;
Whereas the Board has begun consideration of the substance and implications
of the IDN Committee's papers and final report, but is not yet prepared
to determine its next steps in this area;
It is resolved [02.88] that the Board conveys its
sincere thanks to the members of the ICANN IDN Committee for their diligent
work and valuable contributions: Masanobu Katoh (Chair), Mouhamet Diop,
Patrik Faltstrom, Qiheng Hu, John Klensin, Sang-Hyon Kyong, Stuart Lynn,
Elisabeth Porteneuve, Mohd Sharil Tarmizi, and Vincent Wen-Sung Chen;
and thanks Andrew McLaughlin and David Thompson for their staff support;
and
Further resolved [02.89] that the Board asks the
members of the IDN Committee to delay the Committee's formal termination
until the conclusion of the October ICANN meeting in Shanghai, so that
the committee can continue to monitor developments in the IETF, review
further community feedback on its discussion papers and Final Report,
and be available to advise the Board as needed in the area of internationalized
domain names.
Peter de Blanc
Whereas:
The ICANN Board notes with deep sadness the recent passing of Peter
de Blanc, who was an active and constructive participant in the ICANN
process in many roles, including as a member of the ccTLD constituency
and as a representative of that constituency on the DNSO Names Council.
Peter's service to the Internet community was longstanding, particularly
his commitment to bringing the benefits of the Internet to new areas
including his faithful service as administrative contact for the .vi
ccTLD. Peter will be greatly missed as a citizen of the Internet, as
a colleague, and as a valued friend.
Resolved [02.90] that the ICANN Board recognizes
the testament to Peter's service as noted in the 28
June letter from the ccTLD managers;
Further resolved [02.91] that the Board joins with
the ccTLD managers in formally recognizing Peter's many outstanding
contributions to ICANN;
Further resolved [02.92] that the Board expresses
its deep sympathies and condolences to Peter's family.
Thanks
to Hosts, Sponsors, and Staff
Whereas, the preparation for and execution of the ICANN
Bucharest meeting has been conducted in an exemplary fashion;
Whereas, the hospitality, facilities, attention to the needs of the
participants, and extraordinary efforts to provide support have been
without peer;
Now therefore [02.93]:
The ICANN Board expresses its deep appreciation and thanks, on its
own behalf and on behalf of all participants to the local hosts and
organizers, most particularly the support and hard work of Minister
of Communications and Information Technology Dan Nica, Professor Doina
Banciu (General Manager of ICI Bucharest), Dr. Ing. Eugenie Staicut
(Head of RNC Department-ICI Bucharest), Victor Ciuperca (ICI Bucharest),
and the following ICI Bucharest staff who made the Bucharest meeting
such an outstanding success: Christian Mitu, Dan Mihalcea, Florentina
Onea, Dan Paraschiv, Mircea Cornea, Cristian Haja, Andrei Petrescu,
Florin Mihalache, Adrian Belmega, Ion Dumitrascu, Ion Manea, Olga
Olaru, Diana Petrescu, Cristian Radulescu, Mihaela Moholea, Madalina
Zamfir, Ani Neacsu, Dragos Vlad, Andrei Niculescu, Irina Stoltz, Raluca
Andrei, Alina Pruna, and Karina Berceanu.
The Board would also like to thank Connex, the main sponsor of the
meeting, for its generous support, and in particular, the work of
Alexandru Hurdubaie, Manager of Data, and their staff: Lucian Lupascu,
Liviu Neaga, Dragos Dobre, Adrian Ciobanu, Alina Iordan, Cristian
Duta, Florentin Mirea, George Popescu, Fadi Rida, Florin Druzian,
Oana Fodoran. The contribution of Flamingo, the second main sponsor,
is also deeply appreciated, and especially the assistance of its staff
members: Ion Dinescu, Alexandru Carlan, Elena Barbu, Carmen Olteanu,
Andreea Constantinescu, Adrian Cretescu, Liviu Popescu, and Mihai
Jinga.
Additional sponsors whose support for the ICANN meeting is greatly
appreciated include CENTR, Afilias Global Registry, The Global Name
Registry, NeuStar, ANISP (National Association of Internet Service
Providers from Romania), Cisco Romania, ccTLD Constituency Secretariat,
UltraDNS, Oracle AG Romania, Ericsson, CPI, Intrarom, HP Romania,
Software ITC, ATIC, PCNet Data Network, MCD Infonet, RomTeamSolutions,
Xerox Romania, Computerland, and Shark Industries. We would also like
to acknowledge the hard work of the staff of the Marriott Grand Hotel;
the hotel proved an exceptional and hospitable location for the ICANN
meeting.
In addition, the Board expresses its great appreciation to John Crain,
Diane Schroeder, Theresa Swinehart, Mary Hewitt, Dan Halloran, Herbert
Vitzthum; Joel Jaeggli; Johnny Erikkson; Laura Brewer; and Terri Darrenougue
and the rest of the ICANN staff for their dedicated efforts in ensuring
the smooth operation of the meeting.
Thanks to Andrew
McLaughlin
Whereas, Andrew McLaughlin has faithfully
served the Corporation early 1999 as a consultant, as an employee, as
Chief Policy Officer, as Treasurer, and, most recently, as Vice President
and Chief Policy Officer;
Whereas, as of 1 July 2002, he will be resigning as Vice President
and Chief Policy Officer, and will become a halftime employee;
Whereas, he will return to the Berkman Center at Harvard University
to resume his academic career;
Whereas, the Board wishes to take note of his extraordinary contributions
to ICANN over the years; and
Whereas, the Board is grateful for his willingness to continue part-time
as an ICANN employee to facilitate an orderly transition;
Resolved [02.94] that the Board deeply appreciates
Andrew McLaughlin's dedication to ICANN over the years of his association,
looks forward to a continuing collegial relationship over the coming
months and beyond, and wishes him all the best on his return to academe
and in the future.
Thanks to Karen Rose
Whereas, Karen Rose will shortly leave her position with the United
States Department of Commerce. Karen has been one of the unsung heroes
of the evolution of the Internet community's processes for coordinating
the assignment of key technical parameters, including the domain names.
She was instrumental in the organization of the global discussions that
led to the issuance of the Green and White Papers. She has been a tireless
supporter of community's efforts to implement the concepts of the White
Paper, including the establishment and recognition of ICANN and the
introduction of competition in domain-name registration services. Throughout
this time she has been a vital ambassador among the many and diverse
constituencies whose cooperation has been essential to ICANN's development
as a global, private-sector, consensus-creation body, and most impressively,
she has done it with grace and good humor in frequently highly contentious
circumstances.
Therefore [02.95] the ICANN Board, on behalf of
the worldwide Internet community, expresses the deepest appreciation
and respect for the critical contributions of Karen Rose to ICANN and
to the concept of global private-sector coordination of the assignment
of the Internet's technical parameters.
Comments concerning
the layout, construction and functionality of this site
should be sent to webmaster@icann.org.
Page Updated
02-Jun-2003
©2002 The Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers. All rights reserved.
|