Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
هذا المحتوى متوفر فقط باللغة (أو اللغات)
ICANN org welcomes this opportunity to provide input on the NCAP Study 2. The input in the attached document is focused on org’s assessment of the implementability of the recommendations should the ICANN Board decide to adopt these, as well as the level of effort and impact of implementation on the new gTLD Program: Next Round.
This submission contains two attachments:
1. ICANN org consolidated response to Public Comment on NCAP Study 2.pdf: This document contain's ICANN org's response to this Public Comment and is in lieu of completing the form.
2. Visible Interruption (VI) and Visible Interruption and Notification (VIN) - Privacy and data protection review.pdf: This document is referenced in the Public Comment response.
ICANN org fully supports the importance of a mitigation strategy for name collisions. We have concerns about the implementability of some of the proposed recommendations in NCAP Study 2. Furthermore, ICANN org would like to point out that should the ICANN Board decide to direct ICANN org to implement these recommendations, it is likely to have an impact on the resources needed for the next round (compared with those used in the 2012 round to mitigate name collisions) and might have an impact on the implementation timeline of the next round.