Please add or modify the following items in the XML source code for this file before depositing the document in the IANA Repository. (https://www.iana.org/domains/idn-tables)
Note: version numbers start at 1. RFC 7940 recommends using simple integers. The version comment is optional, please replace or delete the default comment. Version comments may be used by some tools as part of the page header.
<version comment="[Please replace (or delete) the optional comment]">[Please fill in version number, starting at 1]</version>
<date>[Please fill in with publication date, in YYYY-MM-DD format]</date>
<validity-start>[Please fill in effective date, in YYYY-MM-DD format]</validity-start>
Note: the scope element may be repeated, so that the same document can serve for multiple domains.
<scope type="domain">[Please provide, in ".domain" format]</scope>
Registry Contact Information:
Please fill in the Registry Contact Details.
Change History
If you made technical modifications to the LGR, please summarize them in the Change History (and also note the details in the appropriate section of the description).
PLEASE DELETE THESE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE DEPOSITING THE DOCUMENT
This document specifies a set of Label Generation Rules (LGR) for the Japanese script for the second level domain or domains identified above. The starting point for the development of this LGR can be found in the related Root Zone LGR [RZ-LGR-Jpan]. The format of this file follows [RFC 7940]. This LGR is adapted from the “Reference LGR for the Second Level for the Japanese Script” [Ref-LGR-und-Jpan], for details, see Change History below.
The term “Japanese script” should be understood as combining elements from three Unicode scripts: Han (Kanji), Hiragana and Katakana. For details and additional background on the Japanese script, see “Proposal for a Japanese Script Root Zone LGR” [Proposal-Japanese], including the appendices [Proposal-Japanese-Appendices]. Following existing practice, the LGR also allows letters from the Basic Latin set.
The repertoire contains the code points used in writing the Japanese language using a repertoire appropriate for the Second Level. It is part of JIS X 0208:1997 [100] and it includes 6,356 Han characters, 85 Hiragana characters, 89 Katakana characters, and 2 Common (quasi-Kanji) characters for a subtotal of 6,532 repertoire elements. One of the common characters is shared between Han, Hiragana, and Katakana while the other one is shared between Hiragana and Katakana.
The repertoire is a subset of [Unicode 11.0.0]. For details, see Section 5, “Repertoire” in [Proposal-Japanese]. (The proposal cited has been adopted for the Japanese script portion of the Root Zone LGR.)
For the second level, the repertoire has been augmented with the ASCII digits, U+0030 to U+0039; the ASCII lowercase letters, U+0061 to U+007A; U+002D HYPHEN-MINUS, U+3007 IDEOGRAPHIC NUMBER ZERO, and U+30FB KATAKANA MIDDLE DOT for a total of 6,571 repertoire elements.
Unlike many other non-Latin Second Level Reference LGRs, the Japanese Script LGR includes the basic ASCII Latin letters (a to z) because it is common practice in Japanese text to mix Japanese and ASCII. Therefore including these letters is not seen as creating added confusability or security risks in the context of a Second Level LGR for the Japanese script. It is also supported by current IDNA practice; see [700], for example.
Repertoire Listing: Each code point or range is tagged with the script or scripts with which the code point is used and one or more other character categories. For each repertoire element, one or more references document sufficient justification for inclusion in the repertoire; see the “References” below.
The variants defined in this LGR are limited to those required for use in zones not shared with any other script. As such, this LGR does not define cross-script variants. However, using this LGR concurrently with any LGR for Chinese and Korean in the same zone will introduce some in-script variants due to cross-script variant transitivity. This will also create potential cross-script issues when used with the same LGRs. For details, see Section 6, “Variants” in [Proposal-Japanese]. Mitigation of these in-script and cross-script variants can be addressed by using the Common LGR. For details, see Section 3, “Use of Multiple Reference LGRs in the Same Zone” in [Level-2-Overview]. In addition to variants defined by this LGR, the full variant information related to this script and added by concurrent use with the Chinese and Korean LGR(s) can be found in the following LGR: [Ref-LGR-Chinese-Full-Variant-Script]
This LGR defines visually identical variants within the Japanese script and may accept all variants acquired through integration with the Chinese RZ-LGR [CLGR] and Korean RZ-LGR [KLGR] as appropriate. These variant definitions are required when using this LGR together with the Common LGR in label processing, but they also reflect a certain consistency in the approach to variants across typographically related scripts. For details, see Sections 6, 7, and 8 of [Proposal-Japanese].
Of the imported variants, only those that result in an in-script variant for the Japanese script are explicitly listed in this LGR. However, all cross-repertoire mappings would be applied as part of integration into the Root Zone LGR. Finally, adding the ideographic number zero to the repertoire resulted in an additional variant association with the Latin letter “o”.
Where variants exist between the Chinese, Japanese and Korean scripts, out-of-repertoire variants may be defined with an out-of-repertoire-var mapping type. As result of integration, including the effects of cross-script transitivity, the number of cross-script variants listed for these scripts may be larger than defined in Section 6, “Variants” in [Proposal-Japanese].
When integrated to be used with another script LGR in the same zone, this LGR may inherit additional blocked cross-script variants by integration; they may not be listed here unless they reflect resulting in-script variants. Always use an applicable merged, or Common LGR created by integration for determining cross-script collisions of labels. However, the list of in-repertoire variants in this LGR is exhaustive.
Variant Disposition: All variants are of type “blocked”, making labels that differ only by these variants mutually exclusive: whichever label containing either of these variants is chosen earlier would be delegated, while any other equivalent labels should be blocked. There is no preference among these labels.
This LGR does not define allocatable variants.
The specification of variants in this LGR follows the guidelines in [RFC 8228].
The following source references are used for variant entries in this LGR:
Note that additional variant mappings involving out-of-repertoire Hangul syllables may be added if this LGR is integrated with a Korean script LGR.
The following classes are defined for use in WLE and context rules:
By default, the LGR includes the rules and actions to implement the following restrictions mandated by the IDNA protocol. They are marked with ⍟.
The LGR defines the following context rules.
Note that U+30FB KATAKANA MIDDLE DOT is used to separate words. Therefore, the letters following a KATAKANA MIDDLE DOT must be restricted to the same set as for the start of label. For the second level, the context rule “at-start-of-word” has been defined which covers the start of a label as well as the context following a KATAKANA MIDDLE DOT.
Iteration marks: The iteration marks, U+3005, U+309D, U+309E, U+30FD, and U+30FE, are used to reiterate the pronunciation or meaning of the preceding character. As such, these characters have neither particular pronunciation nor meanings by themselves. Similar considerations apply to the prolonged sound mark (U+30FC). Accordingly, any sequence of two or more iteration marks and/or the prolonged sound mark has no meaning and is disallowed by the following WLE rule:
The following WLE rule implements an additional restriction on HYPHEN-MINUS in a Japanese context.
This LGR includes the default actions for LGRs as well as the action needed to invalidate labels with misplaced combining marks. They are marked with ⍟. For a description see [RFC 7940].
The LGR defines a Japanese-specific action invalidating any label containing a hyphen adjacent to Japanese characters.
The LGR in this document has been adapted from the corresponding Reference LGR for the Second Level. The Second Level Reference LGR for the Japanese Script was developed by Michel Suignard and Asmus Freytag, based on the Root Zone LGR for the Japanese script and information contained or referenced therein; see [RZ-LGR-Jpan]. Suitable extensions for the second level have been applied according to the [Guidelines] and with community input. The original proposal for a Root Zone LGR for the Japanese script, that this LGR is based on, was developed by the Japanese Generation Panel. For more information on methodology and contributors to the underlying Root Zone LGR, see Sections 4 and 8 in [Proposal-Japanese], as well as [RZ-LGR-Overview].
Adopted from the Second Level Reference LGR for the Japanese Script [Ref-LGR-und-Jpan] without normative changes.
References [0] and up refer to the Unicode Standard versions in which corresponding code points were initially encoded. For example, a reference value of [0] means a character was first encoded in Unicode Version 1.1. References [100] and up indicate that the code point is included in one of the following source references: JIS X 0208:1997, Survey on the user perception of the homographic character set specified by JGP, CLGR repertoire, and KLGR repertoire. For example, a reference value of [300] means a code point listed here is included in the CLGR repertoire. References cited for variants indicate whether variant mappings match a source reference in mapping, variant type or both. Entries in the table may have multiple source reference values.
In addition, the following general references are cited in this document:
In the listing of the repertoire by code point, references starting from [0] refer to the version of the Unicode Standard in which the corresponding code point was initially encoded. Other references (starting from [100]) document usage of code points. Entries in the table may have multiple source reference values. In the listing of whole label evaluation and context rules, reference [150] indicates the source for common rules. For more details, see the Table of References below.
Where links to certain references are not available, the data may be archived as part of [Proposal-Japanese].
]]>