ICANN | Letter from J. Beckwith Burr to Louis Touton | 9 November 2002
  ICANN Logo

Letter from J. Beckwith Burr to Louis Touton Regarding Amendment to Whois Provisions of .name Registry Agreement

(9 November 2002)


J. Beckwith Burr
(202) 663-6695
Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering
2445 M STREET, N.W.
WASHINGTON, DC 20037-1420

TELEPHONE (202) 663-6000
FACSIMILE (202) 663-6363

NEW YORK, NY 10022-4697
TELEPHONE (212) 230-8800
FACSIMILE (212) 230-8888

BALTIMORE, MD 21202-1036
TELEPHONE (410) 986-2800
FACSIMILE (410) 986-2828

10th FLOOR
TYSONS CORNER, VA 22102-4859
TELEPHONE (703) 251-9700
FACSIMILE (703) 251-9797

TELEPHONE 011 (44) (20) 7872-1000
FACSIMILE 011 (44) (20) 7839-3537

TELEPHONE 011 (32) (2) 285-4900
FACSIMILE 011 (32) (2) 285-4949

TELEPHONE 011 (49) (30) 2022-6400
FACSIMILE 011 (49) (30) 2022-6500


November 9, 2002


Louis Touton, General Counsel
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
4676 Admiralty Way
Suite 330
Marina Del Rey, California 90292

Re: Request to Amend Registry Contract

Dear Louis:

I am writing on behalf of my client, Global Name Registry Limited, which operates the .name top-level domain (TLD) under an agreement with ICANN dated August 1, 2001 (the Registry Agreement). The Registry Agreement, and Appendix O thereto, obligate Global Name Registry to provide access to certain personal information about .name registrants (Registry Data). This letter constitutes Global Name Registry's formal request to amend Appendix O to the Registry Agreement, and to make conforming agreements in Appendix F and Appendix G.

Reason for Request

As you know, Global Name Registry's operation of the .name TLD is subject to the laws of the United Kingdom, including the Data Protection Act 1998 (the Act). Adopted to protect fundamental privacy rights long recognized in Europe, the Act limits the manner in which Global Name Registry is permitted to process Registry Data and restricts Global Name Registry's ability to transfer (including by making data available on the public Internet) such information to countries outside of the European Economic Area (excluding Hungary, Switzerland, and Canada, which have received adequacy determinations from the European Commission). The changes sought by Global Name Registry are intended to ensure that its operation of .name complies with the Act. The proposed changes are also intended to respond to increasing worldwide consumer concerns about personal privacy, which are especially relevant in .name, a TLD exclusively designed for use by individuals.

Proposed Contract Amendments

Global Name Registry proposes to replace the existing text of Appendix O to the Registry Agreement with the text set forth in Attachment 1 of this letter. In accordance with the revised text, Global Name Registry proposes to continue to provide four levels of access to Registry Data. The most significant changes are to the way the two most detailed levels, known as "Detailed" and "Extensive," are defined:

  • Free, web-based public access to non-personally identifiable "Summary" information (mostly unchanged from the current specification);
  • Free, web-based public access to non-personally identifiable "Standard" information (mostly unchanged from the current specification);
  • Password protected access to "Detailed" personally identifiable information, not including the home telephone number or e-mail address of registrants, subject to an online contract and the payment of a small fee or similar measures to deter marketers and those who would use the data in connection with criminal activity; and
  • Free, password protected access to "Extensive" information, including home phone and e-mail, subject to a written agreement with Global Name Registry.

The access levels are described in greater detail in the attached documentation.

Requested Amendments Are Consistent with Existing ICANN Policy.

The Registry Agreement requires Global Name Registry to provide "free public query-based access to up-to-date information about domain-name and nameserver registrations maintained by Registry Operator in connection with the Registry TLD." (Registry Agreement §3.10.1.). The proposed amendments do not change this requirement: Any searcher willing to sign an agreement with Global Name Registry that (1) identifies a permissible purpose for which access is sought, and (2) enables Global Name Registry to hold searchers accountable for misuse of Registry Data, will receive a password to access the database.

Nor does Global Name Registry seek to further limit the purposes for which Registry Data may be used: ICANN's generic registry agreement specifically permits registry operators to prohibit the use of Registry Data for marketing, and it goes without saying that ICANN permits registry operators to forbid illegal uses of personal information about registrants in the top level domain they operate.

The modifications to Appendix O sought by Global Name Registry do not change ICANN policy and need not be the subject of an ICANN's consensus policy development process. While other top-level domains might make the same argument, we submit that .name is unique among top-level domains. The consequences of misuse of personal information can be particularly damaging to individuals, the only permitted registrants in .name.

ICANN has the Authority to Approve the Proposed Amendments.

Although the initial specifications for the data elements reported, format of responses to queries, data update frequency, query types supported, and protocols through which Global Name Registry provides access to Registry Data are contained in Appendix O, the Registry Agreement permits changes to such specifications with the "mutual written consent of ICANN and Registry Operator" or in connection with ICANN policy development. (Registry Agreement §3.10.1.) As Global Name Registry's proposed contract modifications are consistent with existing ICANN policy, the ICANN board has the necessary authority to accept the amendments.

The Proposed Amendments Reflect Public Input.

Notwithstanding the fact that ICANN has the authority to approve the modifications proposed by Global Name Registry in the ordinary course of contract management, the proposed amendments reflect considerable input from relevant stakeholders both inside and outside the ICANN community. Beginning in February of this year, Global Name Registry has discussed the proposed changes with members of the law enforcement community, intellectual property holders, privacy advocates, registry operators, registrars, and members of the technical community. Global Name Registry informally and formally briefed the Names Council's Whois Task Force, and met with the business, intellectual property, registry, and registrar constituencies of the DNSO. Global Name Registry has listened carefully to these stakeholders, and has modified its proposal to respond to concerns raised in these consultations. ICANN has received e-mails from the Registry constituency and the IP constituency regarding our request.

Most recently, in Shanghai, a registrar expressed concern about the proposed $2 fee for use of the "Detailed" search service, on the grounds that Global Name Registry should not profit from Whois searches related to customers of registrars. Global Name Registry does not expect the $2 fee to become a revenue source for the registry; rather, the fee is intended to discourage data mining by marketers and other casual and potentially criminal users. Nonetheless, Global Name Registry understands the concern, and has modified its proposed revisions to Appendix O to include the following provision:

No more than ninety (90) days following its implementation of the Detailed Whois service, Registry Operator shall determine the extent to which the fee revenue (if any) exceeds Registry Operator's costs in implementing this service. Registry Operator shall distribute excess revenues, if any, generated through Detailed searches to ICANN Registrars whose data is returned in response to a Detailed Whois query.

In addition, Global Name Registry has made various revisions and included specific text on the basis of suggestions from interested stakeholders.

Global Name Registry now seeks the Board's prompt approval for the proposed contract modifications, and we request that this matter be placed on the agenda for the next telephonic meeting of the Board. In order to make our requested changes clear to the Board, we have attached (1) the proposed substitute Appendix O; (2) a description of the proposed changes; and (3) the text of the proposed "Extensive Agreement" to be used by Global Name Registry.

Global Name Registry appreciates your efforts to bring this matter to the Board in the very near future. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the attached materials.


J. Beckwith Burr

cc: Francis Coleman, Vice President and General Counsel
Karen Elizaga, Vice President - Policy

Enclosures (3)

Comments concerning the layout, construction and functionality of this site
should be sent to webmaster@icann.org.

Page Updated 26-Nov-2002
©2002 The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. All rights reserved.