Second Annual IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process Review
|Comment/Reply Periods (*)||Important Information Links|
|Comment Open:||9 April 2012|
|Comment Close:||30 April 2012|
|Close Time (UTC):||23:59 UTC||Public Comment Announcement|
|Reply Open:||1 May 2012||To Submit Your Comments (Forum Closed)|
|Reply Close:||21 May 2012||View Comments Submitted|
|Close Time (UTC):||23:59 UTC||Report of Public Comments|
|Purpose (Brief):||ICANN is now opening a public comment forum for the second annual review of the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process. Community members and specifically those who were directly involved in the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process, including requesters, public authorities, and end users of the delegated IDN ccTLDs, are kindly asked to provide feedback on their experience in the process.|
|Current Status:||The IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process completed its second year of operation in November 2011. The Final Implementation Plan for the Fast Track approved by the ICANN Board requires that the process undergo review annually.|
|Next Steps:||Following completion of the second public comment, ICANN will compile community feedback and publish a summary and analysis of the comments received. Recommendations for changes to the Final Implementation Plan for the Fast Track Process will be publicly posted and presented to the ICANN Board at its next available meeting following the conclusion of the comment period. The ICANN Board will consider next steps, including which of the proposed changes should be implemented, and if additional community discussion is required.|
|Staff Contact:||Naela Sarras||Email:||firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose|
To help initiate the discussion, ICANN staff has listed the following topics as ones that can benefit from further discussion. It should be noted that all aspects of the Fast Track Process are under review, so the raising of all related subjects is welcomed.
The evaluation of string similarity continues to be a topic of discussion in the ICANN community. The final Integrated Issues Report published by the IDN Variant Issues Project recommended string similarity as an area where further work is needed. Another recent publication from SSAC, SAC052 report pointed out that further review and modifications of the String Similarity Review processes are clearly required to reduce ambiguity and increase consistency in the process.
As described in the Final Implementation Plan for IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process, the DNS Stability Panel reviews strings for confusability with existing ISO-3166-1 two-letter codes, TLDs, other TLDs requested in the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process, and applied-for strings in the new gTLD Process. The panel has successfully completed the assessment of string similarity for 46 strings to date.
ICANN is committed to upholding the community's directive to not delegate confusingly similar strings. In addition to fulfilling the processes identified in the Final Implementation Plan, we ask community members, specifically those who were directly involved in the Fast Track Process, to provide us with feedback on how we may increase the predictability.
Viability of an Appeal Process:
Currently, there is no appeal procedure in the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process, because it was assumed the process was developed for a limited number of non-contentious IDN ccTLDs associated with the ISO 3166-1 two-letter codes.
Should the community determine that an appeal process is required for the Fast Track Process, it will become necessary to articulate the structure and specifics of such a process, taking into account the overarching principles of transparency and accountability of the evaluation process, maintaining the security and stability of the DNS, and respecting the specific requirement proposed by the IDNC WG that the evaluation process is confidential.
The topic of IDN tables was considered in the initial Fast Track Review, and no change was made. On the broader subject of treatment of IDN tables, the first annual review recommended that the role and effect of IDN tables be redirected to other areas of work such as Variant IDN TLDs Project.
Such feedback from the community about IDN tables, as well as discussions in last year's work on the Variant Issues Project resulted in commencing work on an Internet Draft, which specifies a universal IDN table format based on XML. The intention for this format is one that can fully express the spectrum of IDN table rulesets that are known to be in deployment, such as those used in the CJK and Arabic script communities. It is expected this effort will improve the utility of the contributed tables, as well as potentially provide mechanisms by which tables may be used or adapted for use in the root zone, based on the outcome of the other streams of variant work. More information on this will be available to the community through regular updates on the IDN Variant Project.
Currently, the Fast Track Process Final Implementation Plan requires that the process undergo review annually. Given that the volume of requests in the IDN Fast Track Process is expected to be at a smaller rate than when it was first launched, ICANN staff propose the review period be changed from annually to biannually or an as-needed basis.
Proposed Changes to the Final Implementation Plan for IDN ccTLD Fast Track Processes Document:
In the course of last year, staff flagged a number of non-material changes that needed to be made in the Final Implementation Plan for IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process document. This includes formatting changes, fixing a few typographical and grammatical mistakes, replacing out of date URLs, revising the table of contents, and updating the process flow charts in Appendix 1 to Module 5. The update to the flow charts was necessary to clarify the Fast Track process using proper flow chart methodology. The proposed changes are included and tracked in a document linked in Section III of the Pubic Forum.
|Section II: Background|
ICANN conducted its first annual review of the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process and its implementation from October 2010 to January 2011. A summary and analysis was published in February 2011 and the Board acknowledged the Fast Track review at the San Francisco ICANN meeting, in March 2011.
Community input provided in the first annual review resulted in several public sessions and the formation of a sub-group within ccNSO PDP Working Group 1. This sub-group was tasked by the ccNSO to provide guidance and clarifications on the interpretation of the rules for handling cases of string similarity in the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process. Although the work of the sub-group still continues, a specific recommendation was proposed during the Dakar ICANN meeting in October 2011, and the ccNSO adopted a resolution recommending that the ICANN Board approve an amendment to the Fast Track Implementation Plan in order to provide further guidance for a specific case of string similarity. On 8 December 2011, the ICANN Board of Directors approved the amendment to the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process Implementation Plan, and ICANN provided a notice of publication for the Revised Implementation Plan.
|Section III: Document and Resource Links|
|Proposed changes [PDF, 3.35 MB] to the Final Implementation Plan for IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process document.|
|Section IV: Additional Information|
Process Statistics as of the date of this posting:
(*) Comments submitted after the posted Close Date/Time are not guaranteed to be considered in any final summary, analysis, reporting, or decision-making that takes place once this period lapses.