Skip to main content

Minutes – Board Risk Committee (RC) Meeting

RC Attendees: Steve Crocker (Chair), Rajasekhar Ramaraj, Mike Silber, Bruce Tonkin and Suzanne Woolf.

Other Board Attendees: Bertrand de La Chapelle and Ram Mohan (attended in part)

Staff Attendees: Akram Atallah – Chief Operating Officer; John Jeffrey – General Counsel and Secretary; Samantha Eisner, Patrick Jones, Diane Schroeder, Ken Shiu, and Amy Stathos.

The following is a summary of discussions, actions taken and actions identified:

  1. Minutes – Reviewed and approved minutes from RC meeting held on 17 February 2010.

  2. Re-assessment of Enterprise Risk Management – Staff provided a presentation of the results of management's re-assessment of the corporation's risk identification process, and comparison of prior year's identification and assessment efforts. The RC suggested modifications to the report and the inclusion of qualitative metrics to supplement the reassessment work, as well as the need to better scale the assessment. The RC also discussed the use of past experience within the organization to identify additional quantitative measurements to give additional value to the assessment work. The RC suggested that the next step is to provide management's response to the assessment and note what is being done to mitigate the identified risks. Staff noted that the assessment was completed in time to factor in resources to address the identified risks into the proposed FY12 budget. The RC also discussed at what stage it may be feasible to expand the persons contributing to the risk assessment work.

    • Action:

      • Staff to provide a report to the RC on the steps taken to manage the identified risks.

      • Staff to condense information into a report on key points, including mitigation/management efforts, for presentation to the Board and to the public.

      • RC member to provide Chair with some points related to risk mitigation as it relates to the New gTLD program, for use in the Chair's committee report in San Francisco.

  3. Project Level Risk Management Update: The RC received a report on the project-level risks related to entering proposed registry agreements. Due to time constraints, the RC deferred discussion of project-level risk management related to the Affirmation of Commitments.

    • Action:

      • Staff to provide a report on project-level risk management for presentation to the Board.

  4. Other Business. The RC briefly discussed project-level risk mitigation planning in relationship to the New gTLD program.

    • Action:

      • Staff to provide report to the RC on continued risk mitigation efforts relating to the New gTLD program.

Domain Name System
Internationalized Domain Name ,IDN,"IDNs are domain names that include characters used in the local representation of languages that are not written with the twenty-six letters of the basic Latin alphabet ""a-z"". An IDN can contain Latin letters with diacritical marks, as required by many European languages, or may consist of characters from non-Latin scripts such as Arabic or Chinese. Many languages also use other types of digits than the European ""0-9"". The basic Latin alphabet together with the European-Arabic digits are, for the purpose of domain names, termed ""ASCII characters"" (ASCII = American Standard Code for Information Interchange). These are also included in the broader range of ""Unicode characters"" that provides the basis for IDNs. The ""hostname rule"" requires that all domain names of the type under consideration here are stored in the DNS using only the ASCII characters listed above, with the one further addition of the hyphen ""-"". The Unicode form of an IDN therefore requires special encoding before it is entered into the DNS. The following terminology is used when distinguishing between these forms: A domain name consists of a series of ""labels"" (separated by ""dots""). The ASCII form of an IDN label is termed an ""A-label"". All operations defined in the DNS protocol use A-labels exclusively. The Unicode form, which a user expects to be displayed, is termed a ""U-label"". The difference may be illustrated with the Hindi word for ""test"" — परीका — appearing here as a U-label would (in the Devanagari script). A special form of ""ASCII compatible encoding"" (abbreviated ACE) is applied to this to produce the corresponding A-label: xn--11b5bs1di. A domain name that only includes ASCII letters, digits, and hyphens is termed an ""LDH label"". Although the definitions of A-labels and LDH-labels overlap, a name consisting exclusively of LDH labels, such as"""" is not an IDN."