ICANN Blogs

Read ICANN Blogs to stay informed of the latest policymaking activities, regional events, and more.

WHOIS & What’s to Come

27 March 2013
By Margie Milam

By Margie Milam, Senior Director, Strategic Initiatives

In October ICANN’s President & CEO, Fadi Chehadé, announced an ambitious plan for tackling one of ICANN’s most controversial issues—WHOIS. Undeterred by the decade’s long debate, and encouraged by the WHOIS Review Team’s Report, he challenged the notion that WHOIS couldn’t be fixed, and instead suggested a fresh approach. In line with this vision, the ICANN Board approved a two-pronged strategy to adopt the WHOIS Review Team (RT)’s recommendations to fully enforce the existing WHOIS policy and to follow the SSAC’s recommendations to redefine the purpose and scope of data directory services. When complete, ICANN hopes to transform the current antiquated WHOIS system into one that is better suited for the needs of tomorrow’s Internet.

I’d like to share with you some information on ICANN’s progress on these WHOIS-related activities.

Execution of the WHOIS RT Recommendations. The Board’s November WHOIS resolution prioritized and kicked-off a series of activities throughout ICANN—involving the Board, Staff, registrars, registries, the GNSO, At-Large and other interested community members— to implement the WHOIS RT Recommendations. Highlights include:

  • Reshaping online services. Chris Gift, ICANN’s newly appointed Vice President of Online Community Services, has been tapped by Fadi to, among other duties, create an "information portal" that will be a one-stop shop for WHOIS related inquiries targeted at helping consumers understand and use WHOIS. The portal is to include WHOIS look-ups for both thin and thick registries, and links to educational materials and a compilation of WHOIS policy and provisions. This department also will build tools to statistically sample and report on WHOIS accuracy as part of a new effort to increase data accuracy and create accuracy metrics, as recommended by the WHOIS-RT. Research and planning are under way for both of these key initiatives.
  • Enhanced Contractual Framework supporting WHOIS. The WHOIS RT noted areas where existing contracts could be enhanced to better support enforcement of current WHOIS obligations, improve accuracy, and issues related to privacy services. In response to these recommendations, ICANN has proposed amendments to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) that include:
  • ICANN Compliance efforts to enforce WHOIS obligations. The WHOIS RT offered recommendations to improve ICANN Compliance Team’s structure, communications, and enforcement of WHOIS obligations. Substantial progress has been made. Highlights include:

A more complete description of the implementation activities is contained in the table below and detailed program reporting will be regularly issued to enable the community to track the progress of these activities.

Under Development: Next Generation Data Directory Services

In December, ICANN launched a new effort to replace the current WHOIS system with a call for volunteers to serve on an Expert Working Group. After an exhaustive search, the members of the Expert Working Group were announced, and each of them brings extraordinary expertise, leadership and consensus building skills. Led by Jean Francois Baril, the Expert Working Group will start from scratch, and take a fresh look at what the ideal data directory services might be. This effort is expected to produce a model for a replacement system—referred to as the "Next Generation Data Directory Services"—that is to take into account data accuracy and access issues, while at the same time including appropriate safeguards for privacy. The outcome of the Expert Working Group is to serve as a foundation for the GNSO’s creation of new consensus policy (and requisite contract changes, as appropriate), as requested by the ICANN Board.

The Expert Working Group met for two days in Los Angeles, and met again for another two days in London, prior to convening once again in Beijing. For more information on the group’s activities, including meeting reports, please visit the Expert Working Group’s Wiki: or attend the session in Beijing on Monday April for the latest developments regarding this key project.

We will continue to keep you updated on implementation of the WHOIS Review Team recommendations and the Expert Working Group’s progress, and look forward to receiving your input in Beijing, online and in future webinars.

Implementation of WHOIS Review Team Recommendations

 

Recommendation

Summary

Specific Details

More Information

1

WHOIS as a Strategic Priority

Cross-functional Teams established to address all aspects of WHOIS RT Recommendations

  • Expanded Compliance Team under CEO
  • Strategic Initiatives Team addressing WHOIS

Vice President of Compliance (Maguy Serad) appointed to report directly to the CEO

   

CEO overseeing improvements to enforcement of contracts

  • Draft 2013 RAA includes many compliance & WHOIS related enhancements
  • Draft New gTLD Agmt requires registrars to use 2013 RAA
  • CEO an active participant in the negotiations

Draft RAA Public Comment 7-28 Mar 2013: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/proposed-raa-07mar13-en.htm
Proposed New gTLD Agreement: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/base-agreement-05feb13-en.htm

   

Expert Working Group launched by Board to Develop Next Generation Data Directory Services

  • Working Group Output to feed into Board- directed GNSO PDP on gTLD Registration Data Services & requisite contract changes, if appropriate
  • GNSO Preliminary Issue Report on gTLD Data Directory Services published as a first step for the PDP

Preliminary Issue Report Public Comment Forum 15 March- 19 April 2013) http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gtld-registration-data-15mar13-en.htm
Information on Expert Working Group available here:
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-14feb13-en.htm

2

Single WHOIS Policy

Single Webpage for ICANN WHOIS Policies and Provisions

Webpage under development

Work is in progress on the creation of this webpage, with planned completion by April 2013

3

Outreach -- ICANN should ensure that WHOIS policy issues are accompanied by cross-community outreach.

Comprehensive educational outreach plans under development

Draft 2013 RAA includes requirements to link to Registrant Rights & Responsibilities Document, written in simple language to educate registrants on obligations related to WHOIS

http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-registrant-rights-responsibilities-07mar13-en.pdf

4

Compliance – ICANN should ensure that its compliance function is managed in accordance with best practice principles.

Improvements to operations and the enforcement of the current obligations on gTLD Whois, and Increased Communications

Improved Operations and communications in accordance with best practice principles: focus on processes, tools, fact-based decision making and communication

Mid September 2012

  • Rolled out a Consistent Process
  • Shortened Time to Resolution
  • Improved Processing Quality and Effort
  • Requiring Proof of Investigative efforts

Year-One Audit Program, includes review of:

  • Inaccuracy responses
  • Whois data elements "population"
  • Website for free public Whois Access
  • Match of Registry Data Escrow against Bulk Zone File

Improving user experience and Tools

  • Rollout of the consolidated compliance system
  • Moving complaint submission from Internic.net to ICANN.ORG under Compliance
  • Adding site navigation based on complaint types and FAQs
  • Improving email correspondence to the complaint reporter and the Registrar/Registry
  • Adding a follow-up Continuous Improvement Pulse Survey for the reporter and contracted parties
  • Whois Inaccuracy is the first complaint type to migrate to the new application
 

Data Accuracy

     

5

ICANN should ensure that the requirements for accurate WHOIS data are widely and pro-actively communicated.

Comprehensive educational outreach plan under development; Updates to new gTLD Registry Agreement and Draft 2013 RAA requested to improve WHOIS Accuracy

Draft 2013 RAA includes requirements to link to Registrant Rights & Responsibilities Specification, written in simple language to educate registrants on obligations related to WHOIS

Draft 2013 RAA proposes new specifications on WHOIS Accuracy, Privacy/Proxy Services, WHOIS Specification address accuracy related improvements, including verification and validation of certain WHOIS fields.
See: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/proposed-raa-07mar13-en.htm

6

ICANN should take appropriate measures to reduce the number of WHOIS registrations that fall into the accuracy groups "Substantial Failure and Full Failure"

Improvements to the Enforcement of the current obligations on gTLD Whois and Increased Communications to assist in reduction of inaccuracies

Online data accuracy portal under evaluation for resources & scheduling

Evaluation of online tools to generate dynamic reports on the completeness and accuracy of Whois (not individual records).
Reports will be generated by statistical sampling Whois records across all TLDs. Initial plan is due for review by April 7th.

7

ICANN to produce and publish an accuracy report focused on measured reduction in WHOIS registrations on an annual basis.

Online Data Accuracy Tools being scoped to allow for reporting of metrics

 
  • Compliance Metrics for reporting includes proactive compliance improvements
  • Initial plan is due for review April 7 2013

8

ICANN should ensure that there is a clear, unambiguous and enforceable chain of contractual agreements.

New gTLD Agreement and Draft 2013 RAA Posted for Public Comment

Include enhanced accuracy requirements and commitments to enforce applicable registrant/reseller agreements

See Draft 2013 RAA Posted for Public Comment http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/proposed-raa-07mar13-en.htm
New gTLD Registry Agreement requires Registrars to be on 2013 RAA. See: Proposed New gTLD Agreement: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/base-agreement-05feb13-en.htm

9

Compliance Metrics. Board should ensure that the Compliance Team develop metrics to track the impact of the annual WHOIS Data Reminder Policy (WDRP) notices to registrants.

Compiling Compliance metrics for reporting and proactive compliance improvements.

 
  • Compliance Dept. published Annual Report in all 6 UN languages
  • Compliance published Monthly Updates reporting in 6 UN languages
  • Online Access to Compliance Metrics on MyICANN – April 2013

10

Data Access – Privacy and Proxy Services – ICANN should initiate processes to regulate and oversee privacy and proxy service providers

Draft 2013 RAA includes specific commitments for privacy/proxy providers

Minimal Requirements included in Draft 2013 RAA, to be supplemented by additional requirements from any GNSO PDP

Draft 2013 RAA proposes new specifications with enforceable contractual commitments on Privacy/Proxy Services. See: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/proposed-raa-07mar13-en.htm

11

Data Access – Common Interface. Overhaul of the Internic to provide enhanced usability for consumers, including the display of full registrant data for all gTLD domain names; operational improvements to include enhanced user awareness.

Informational Portal to revamp the Internic Service proposed, and

Communications Plan to be coordinated with launch of Portal

Informational Portal being scoped, with resources and schedule under evaluation

Initial plan is due for review by April 7th.

Communications plan includes:

  • Kick-off announcement, news release, supplemented with social media outreach.
  • Fact sheet or brochure in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish.
  • Develop a list of organizations interested in the issue
  • Promote program milestones through announcements and social media.
  • Keep up-to-date slide deck on Whois issues for speaker’s bureau opportunities.
  • Create video of how to use portal in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish.
 

Internationalized Domain Names

     

12

ICANN should task a working group to determine appropriate internationalized domain name registration data requirements and evaluate available solutions

ICANN will form a community working group to determine appropriate internationalized domain name registration data requirements based on requirements set forth in GNSO internationalized registration data working Group final Report.

New gTLD Registry Agreement and Draft 2013 RAA include commitments to adopt new internationalized registration data guidelines

See GNSO Internationalized Registration Data Working Group Final Report
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/ird/final-report-ird-wg-06mar12-en.pdf, and Draft 2013 RAA Posted for Public Comment http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/proposed-raa-07mar13-en.htm
New gTLD Registry Agreement requires Registrars to be on 2013 RAA. See: Proposed New gTLD Agreement: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/base-agreement-05feb13-en.htm

13

The final data model, including (any) requirements for the translation or transliteration of the registration data, should be incorporated in relevant Registrar & Registry agreements.

ICANN will form a community working group to produce a registration data model

New gTLD Registry Agreement and Draft 2013 RAA include commitments to adopt new internationalized registration data guidelines

See SAC 054: SSAC Report on the Domain Name Registration Data Model http://www.icann.org/en/groups/ssac/documents/sac-054-en.pdf
Preliminary Issue Report for GNSO PDP on Translation/Transliteration posted for public comment at: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/transliteration-contact-08jan13-en.htm

14

Metrics should be developed to maintain and measure the accuracy of the internationalized registration data and corresponding data in ASCII, with clearly defined compliance methods and targets.

IDN WHOIS Records to be proactively identified

Online automated tools to proactively test for accuracy to include IDN WHOIS Records is being scoped and resources and schedule under evaluation

Initial plan is due for review by April 7th

 

Authors

Margie Milam