Skip to main content

Board–GAC Working Group Announces Implementation of ATRT Recommendations on GAC Advice and GAC Advice Register

At the ICANN 43 Meeting in San Jose, Costa Rica, the Board-GAC Recommendation Implementation Working Group (BGRI-WG)1 met to review efforts to implement the Accountability and Transparency Review Team’s (ATRT) GAC-related recommendations.2   The BGRI-WG is pleased to announce the final implementation of ATRT Recommendations addressing GAC Advice (Recommendation 9) and the creation and operation of a GAC Advice Register (Recommendation 10).

ATRT Recommendation 9 calls for the clarification of what "constitutes GAC public policy "advice" under the Bylaws."  The BGRI-WG recognized that GAC advice is defined on the GAC website3.  The BGRI-WG noted that this definition covers only GAC advice to the ICANN Board and not other GAC communications to ICANN Supporting Organizations and other Advisory Committees.  Finally, the BGRI-WG recognized that pursuant to GAC Operating Principle 47, the "GAC works on the basis of seeking consensus among its membership."  In the unlikely event of the GAC providing the Board with non-consensus advice, including a full range of opinions, it is expected that the Board will come back to GAC for further clarification and discussion.

ATRT Recommendation 10 calls for the establishment of formal, documented processes under which the Board notifies the GAC of "matters that affect public policy concerns to request GAC advice."  It also directs ICANN to "develop an on-line tool or data base in which each request to the GAC and advice received from the GAC is documented along with the Board’s consideration of and response to each advice."  In Costa Rica, ICANN staff presented to the BGRI-WG a draft Register of GAC Advice to the Board and Board Requests of ICANN Advice.  The BGRI-WG identified a few issues that required further consideration but approved the current version of the register as a first iteration.

Finally, ATRT Recommendation 14 calls in part for establishing "a process to determine when and how ICANN engages senior government officials on public policy issues on a regular and collective basis to complement the existing GAC process."  With respect to ATRT Recommendation 14, the GAC agreed that convening a high-level governmental meeting is one means of raising government support and commitment to the GAC process. Accordingly the GAC will continue to work toward the possibility of holding such a meeting during the next ICANN meeting in Prague.    

The BGRI-WG looks forward to updating the community on its continued work on Recommendations 11-14 in the near future. 

1 Background on the formation, purpose and composition of the BGRI-WG is available at

2 Final Recommendations Of The Accountability And Transparency Review Team, available at [PDF, 3 MB].

3 See

More Announcements
Domain Name System
Internationalized Domain Name ,IDN,"IDNs are domain names that include characters used in the local representation of languages that are not written with the twenty-six letters of the basic Latin alphabet ""a-z"". An IDN can contain Latin letters with diacritical marks, as required by many European languages, or may consist of characters from non-Latin scripts such as Arabic or Chinese. Many languages also use other types of digits than the European ""0-9"". The basic Latin alphabet together with the European-Arabic digits are, for the purpose of domain names, termed ""ASCII characters"" (ASCII = American Standard Code for Information Interchange). These are also included in the broader range of ""Unicode characters"" that provides the basis for IDNs. The ""hostname rule"" requires that all domain names of the type under consideration here are stored in the DNS using only the ASCII characters listed above, with the one further addition of the hyphen ""-"". The Unicode form of an IDN therefore requires special encoding before it is entered into the DNS. The following terminology is used when distinguishing between these forms: A domain name consists of a series of ""labels"" (separated by ""dots""). The ASCII form of an IDN label is termed an ""A-label"". All operations defined in the DNS protocol use A-labels exclusively. The Unicode form, which a user expects to be displayed, is termed a ""U-label"". The difference may be illustrated with the Hindi word for ""test"" — परीका — appearing here as a U-label would (in the Devanagari script). A special form of ""ASCII compatible encoding"" (abbreviated ACE) is applied to this to produce the corresponding A-label: xn--11b5bs1di. A domain name that only includes ASCII letters, digits, and hyphens is termed an ""LDH label"". Although the definitions of A-labels and LDH-labels overlap, a name consisting exclusively of LDH labels, such as"""" is not an IDN."