ࡱ> FE'( / 0LDArialbbhb|bbv 0b( 0" ` .  @n?" dd@  @@`` $P9       0AAP3<33:@wʚ;ʚ;g4kdkdv 0b"ppp@ <4dddd` 0bhb <4!d!d4b 0bb80___PPT10 pp?  %0#Update on ccTLD Agreements /Montevideo 9 September, 2001 Andrew McLaughlin "0Z & Introduction @Posted last week: ccTLD Update, with background and explanation Two model agreements: Agreement for Triangular Situations; MoU for Legacy Situations Reasons for posting Finalization of proposed agreement with auDA Facilitate one-to-one negotiations with transparency to everyone Provide texts for community discussionsT,}SjccTLD Update PostingsDiscussion paper overview Based on past two years of face-to-face and ccTLD constituency meetings Built on materials and drafts from community Background on the role and responsibilities of ccTLDs in the DNS History of ccTLD delegations RFC 1591; IANA News Memos; ICP-1LuA@uA@LNeed for AgreementsMake ICANN-ccTLD relationships: Formalized & defined Transparent to all Reliable ICANN s MoU with US Government Complete transition means  develop appropriate relationships with other entities involved in the Internet s operation L 1w 1w,Q$Key contributions from the community%%$ccTLD Best Practice Guidelines for ccTLD Managers (version 4.1, June 2001) Published by ccTLD Constituency Reflects well established principles of trusteeship and responsibility to local Internet community GAC Principles Emphasizes private sector leadership Framework of accountabilityTKZZZAZKA Areas of AgreementAs Internet increases in importance for everyone, good idea to make relationships more solid, formal, transparent, and reliable. Delegated ccTLD manager serves as a trustee in service of the local Internet community   Big Pictureb  The designated manager is the trustee of the top-level domain for both the nation, in the case of a country code, and the global Internet community.  J. Postel, RFC 15918  Multiple Models RequiredNo single agreement, or single structure, will work for every ccTLD Enormous diversity of management structures Organizational forms Mechanisms of accountability Relationships (or not) with governments&DD Two Basic Situations Legacy situation: The IANA monitors the trust locally and globally Triangular situation: The national government, where interested, commits to responsible monitoring of the local interest; IANA monitors the global interest6334:  !Documents for the Two Situations  " $$kLegacy situation: Agreement between ICANN and ccTLD manager Triangular situation: ccTLD manager & national government: agreement or equivalent addressing local interest (see .ca Umbrella Agreement) National government & ICANN: letter or other communication ccTLD manager & ICANN: agreement covering global interest Flexibility to accommodate other situations fSPP-P$.+  Points to be coveredNRedelegation & and applicable principles Local and global policy responsibilities ccTLD ==> local Internet community ICANN ==> global Internet community ccTLD relationship with ICANN/IANA Detailed definition of ICANN/IANA responsibilities & standards for performing them ICANN funding for DNS coordination functions, root server, etc.jRG#S@RG#S@ Triangular Situation *Applies where ccTLD and government reach their own arrangement. Topics covered Recognize delegation; standards for redelegation. Local and global policy responsibilities ccTLD -- ICANN/IANA relationship Technical specification Stable and secure registry & nameserver operations ICANN/IANA responsibilities to maintain: Authoritative root server system Authoritative and public available ccTLD database Audit trail regarding changes & redelegation ICANN funding   in accordance with an equitable scale, based on ICANN s total fundingOZ|ZZ3Z)ZZWZO|3)  W Legacy SituationsGovernment not directly involved Model MoU for legacy situations Light & minimalist Memorializes existing intended commitments of ICANN and ccTLD manager Balance: Government informed, but consent not required Work this out in cooperation with ccTLD manager@AZZ0ZA0' Progress to DateSteady progress (What a long, strange trip it s been& ) Each ccTLD is in a different situation regarding type of agreement and timing E.g., Australia (.au) Strong need for face-to-face discussion & negotiation; also strong need for transparency & community discussion Understand local situations; matrix into global framework Staff capacity: We re able to do 5 a monthP'PNPPqP;P,P'Nq;,What s next& A  non-legal explanation of the current models posted. Triangular model where GAC principles have been implemented; Legacy model as baseline for all other situations. Regional meetings provide great opportunities to go through models in gruesome detail. Face to face meetings have been useful and will be focus in coming months.KKA Plea $Read the model agreements WITH the ccTLD Update! Lots of good explanation and context Effort to avoid misinterpretation or misunderstanding&1[1[Pb4  ` 33` Sf3f` 33g` f` www3PP` ZXdbmo` \ғ3y`Ӣ` 3f3ff` 3f3FKf` hk]wwwfܹ` ff>>\`Y{ff` R>&- {p_/̴>?" dd@(?" d3d@   " @ ` n?" dd@   @@``PR    @ ` ` p>> bZ (    0߸  `}  T Click to edit Master title style! !  0L  `  RClick to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level!     S  0H ^ `  X*  0 ^   Z*  0d ^ `  Z*x  s *S"?',ZB  c $D"YYZB   c $D"YYH  0޽h ? 3380___PPT10. Ц7 Default Design}  $(  r  S L>  r  S  `    H  0޽h ? 33___PPT10i. o?+D=' *= @B +}  P$(  r  S x& `}   r  S DO `  H  0޽h ? 33___PPT10i. |+D=' *= @B +}  $(  r  S L `}   r  S  `  H  0޽h ? 33___PPT10i. z>+D=' *= @B +}  0$(  r  S " `}   r  S # `  H  0޽h ? 33___PPT10i. Mz+D=' *= @B +}  $(  r  S   `}   r  S   `  H  0޽h ? 33___PPT10i.  @+D=' *= @B +}   $(   r  S  `}   r  S d `  H  0޽h ? 33___PPT10i. +D=' *= @B +$  $$(  $r $ S 8 `}   r $ S  `  H $ 0޽h ? 3380___PPT10. @$  @($(  (r ( S h[ `}   r ( S $\ `  H ( 0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.! $  ,$(  ,r , S 0 `}   r , S  `  H , 0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.!`q$  0$(  0r 0 S L `}   r 0 S  `  H 0 0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.!$  4$(  4r 4 S  `}   r 4 S  `  H 4 0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.!k)$  8$(  8r 8 S $ `}   r 8 S  `  H 8 0޽h ? 3380___PPT10.!O.$  <$(  <r < S  `}   r < S | `  H < 0޽h ? 3380___PPT10." c$  @$(  @r @ S d `}   r @ S  `  H @ 0޽h ? 3380___PPT10."~$  pD$(  Dr D S d `}   r D S   `  H D 0޽h ? 3380___PPT10."P $  `H$(  Hr H S $t `}   r H S i `  H H 0޽h ? 3380___PPT10."`\rL ' 358:!=?+BWDFHJM3O_QSU W Oh+'0$ `h   Update on ccTLD Agreem  Vitzthum cc Louis ToutonLD 8uiMicrosoft PowerPointm @w@_"@Gg  0& &&#TNPPl2OMi & TNPP &&TNPP    - "-- !-- "-&/& - &Gy& --- !'q1---& "--%--&& "--%--&--- !0H--- @"Arial- .02 AzUpdate on ccTLD Agreements &!&#-.--Q1-- @"Arial- .2 x Montevideo  .@"Arial- .!2 A9 September, 2001   . .!2 <Andrew McLaughlin  .--"System-&TNPP & ՜.+,D՜.+,d     On-screen ShowHVs[Xb ArialDefault DesignUpdate on ccTLD Agreements Introduction ccTLD Update PostingsNeed for Agreements%Key contributions from the community Areas of Agreement Big PictureMultiple Models RequiredTwo Basic Situations "Documents for the Two Situations Points to be coveredTriangular Situation Legacy SituationsProgress to Date Whats nextA Plea  Fonts UsedDesign Template Slide Titles8_AdHocReviewCycleID_EmailSubject _AuthorEmail_AuthorEmailDisplayNameJiUpdate on ccTLD Agreem.pptsherbert@icann.orgreHerbert Vitzthumre$_7X ,Louis ToutonLouis Touton  !"#$%&'()*+,./012346789:;<>?@ABCDGRoot EntrydO)Current User=SummaryInformation(-PowerPoint Document([XDocumentSummaryInformation85