|
Registration Restrictions
1. Overview. Registrations of Registered Names
within the .pro top-level domain (TLD) are restricted to persons and entities
that are credentialed by appropriate entities (such as through governmental
bodies and professional organizations) to provide professional services.
The .pro TLD is organized into professions-specific second-level domains
(PS-SLDs), which will be introduced in a phased manner. Eligibility for
registration will be verified and periodically re-verified, and will be
signified by digital credentials recorded in the registry database. The
Registry Operator will operate the .pro TLD and its PS-SLDs in consultation
with an Advisory Board and constituent PS-SLD Advisory Boards it will
form.
This Appendix describes the naming conventions used in the .pro TLD,
the registration requirements for first-phase PS-SLDs, the procedure for
establishing subsequent-phase PS-SLDs, the consultative process for ongoing
review and adjustment of registration restrictions, the verification procedure,
and the requirements for digital credentials.
2. Naming Conventions.
2.1 Registered Names. Registered Names in
the .pro TLD will be registered (other than to the Registry Operator
or according to ICANN instructions-see Appendices X and K) at the third
level, in the format <name>.<profession designator>.pro.
2.2 PS-SLD Labels. The second-level labels
used to designate the various professions will be assigned according
to Sections 3, 4, and 6 of this Appendix L.
2.3 Naming Restrictions in Other Parts of the
Registry Agreement. All Registered Names must meet the requirements
in the Registry Agreement and its appendices. Relevant appendices include
Appendix C (Functional Specifications), Appendix F (Registry-Registrar
Agreement), Appendix J (Start-Up Plan), Appendix K (Names Reserved from
Registration), this Appendix L, Appendix M (Enforcement of Registration
Restrictions), and Appendix X (Names Registered to Registry Operator).
2.4 Prohibited Third-Level Labels. The following
words and strings may not be registered as third-level labels for Registered
Names: av, ca, cca, cert, certificate, dir, directory, email, grpa,
http, mail, mx, mx[followed by a number from 0 to 100], ns, ns[followed
by a number from 0 to 100], pro, registrypro, verify, verification,
wap, www and www[followed by a number from 0 to 100]. However, names
having third-level labels that include any of the foregoing words and
strings may be registered, such as dirksen.med.pro.
2.5 Enforcement. The Registry Operator shall
implement technical measures reasonably calculated to enact the requirements
in this Section 2 of this Appendix L.
2.6 Possible Future Allowance of Second-Level
Registrations. Some registrants (particularly professionals in some
jurisdictions that do not semantically correspond to the designated
PS-SLD abbreviations) may prefer to use a domain name that has only
two levels (www.xxx.pro rather than www.xxx.law.pro). In the future,
the Registry Operator may propose to give .pro registrants the option
of registering for two-level domain names directly in the .pro TLD (subject
to the list of restricted domain names in Appendices K and X and in
compliance with the registration policies, processes and requirements
in this Appendix L and Appendices J and M); these domain names would
be distinguished by professional category by being directly routed to
matching Registered Names in the applicable PS-SLD. Any proposal by
the Registry Operator under this Subsection 2.6 must be made in writing
to ICANN and will be subject to ICANN's written approval. In determining
whether to give approval, ICANN will consider any recommendations of
the Advisory Board as contemplated in Subsection 5.1.2.4 of this Appendix
L. If ICANN does not act on a proposal within ninety days, it will report
in writing to the Registry Operator on the status of its consideration.
3. First-Phase PS-SLDs. The following professional
categories will be offered for registration during the initial roll-out
of the .pro TLD:
3.1 Legal.
3.1.1 Basic scope. The legal category
includes credentialed providers of legal and law-related services
(including companies employing such providers). Examples are lawyers,
judges, barristers, legal clinics, legal associations, law firms,
counsel for or legal divisions of other organizations, and legal publishers.
3.1.2 SLD codes. At introduction, the
following SLD labels are authorized to be used for the legal profession
PS-SLD: .law.pro, .avocat.pro, .bar.pro, .recht.pro, and .jur.pro.
Additional SLD labels may be introduced through the consultation,
notification, and approval process described in Section 6 of this
Appendix L.
3.1.3 Registration Qualifications. The
following qualifications will be initially required for the legal
profession PS-SLD:
3.1.3.1 Admission or licensing by,
and good standing with, a certification body or jurisdictional licensing
entity, such as a United States state bar or provincial or territorial
Law Societies in Canada;
3.1.3.2 Admission to a judicial system,
which allows the registering party to represent clients before such
judiciary, such as the status of a barrister in the United Kingdom;
3.1.3.3 Membership in a relevant legal
association which requires that its members be licensed or admitted
to a certifying or licensing entity (such as the Hong Kong Law Society
for solicitors) and regularly verifies the accuracy of its data);
or
3.1.3.4 Formation as an entity or
organization, or a unit of a larger organization that provides legal
services or is organized for such a purpose, and/or has a significant
portion of professional employees or members who satisfy one of
the above criteria, and registers on behalf of such entity or organization.
The above list of qualifications, however, is subject to change by
the Registry Operator in consultation with the Advisory Board once
it is established, provided that the qualifications reasonably ensure
conformity with the basic scope defined in Subsection 3.1.1 of this
Appendix L.
3.1.4 Verification. Qualification of applicants
for Registered Names within the legal profession PS-SLD will be verified
according to the process described in Section 8 of this Appendix L.
3.2 Medical.
3.2.1 Basic scope. The medical category
includes credentialed providers of medical and health-related services
(including companies employing such providers). Examples are doctors,
hospitals, health clinics, medical associations, medical professionals
at, or medical departments of, other organizations, and medical publishers.
3.2.2 SLD codes. At introduction, the
following SLD label is authorized to be used for the medical profession
PS-SLD: .med.pro. Additional SLD labels may be introduced through
the consultation, notification, and approval process described in
Section 6 of this Appendix L.
3.2.3 Registration Qualifications. The
following qualifications will be initially required for the medical
profession PS-SLD:
3.2.3.1 Admission or licensing by,
and good standing with, a licensing or certification body, such
as a local medical association in Germany or by a provincial or
territorial licensing authority in Canada;
3.2.3.2 Holding of a certificate from
an appropriate medical specialty board such as a Member Board of
the American Board of American Specialties or Canadian Medical Register
or an appropriate government authority to practice medicine and/or
prescribe medicine;
3.2.3.3 Admitting privileges to a
hospital;
3.2.3.4 Membership in a relevant professional
association which requires that its members be licensed or admitted
to a certifying or licensing entity and regularly verifies the accuracy
of its licensing data; or
3.2.3.5 Formation as an entity or
organization, or a unit of a larger organization that provides health-related
services or is organized for such a purpose, and/or has a significant
portion of professional employees or members who satisfy one of
the above criteria, and registers on behalf of such entity or organization.
The above list of qualifications, however, is subject to change by
the Registry Operator in consultation with the Advisory Board once
it is established, provided that the qualifications reasonably ensure
conformity with the basic scope defined in Subsection 3.2.1 of this
Appendix L.
3.2.4 Verification. Qualification of applicants
for Registered Names within the medical profession PS-SLD will be
verified according to the process described in Section 8 of this Appendix
L.
3.3 Accountancy.
3.3.1 Basic scope. The accounting category
includes credentialed providers of accounting and accountancy-related
services (including companies employing such providers). Examples
are certified public accountants, chartered accounts, accounting firms,
accounting associations, accounting departments of other organizations,
and accounting publications and publishers.
3.3.2 SLD codes. At introduction, the
following SLD labels are authorized to be used for the accountancy
profession PS-SLD: .cpa.pro, .aaa.pro., aca.pro, .acct.pro. Additional
SLD labels may be introduced through the consultation, notification,
and approval process described in Section 6 of this Appendix L.
3.3.3 Registration Qualifications. The
following qualifications will be initially required for the accountancy
profession PS-SLD:
3.3.3.1 Admission or licensing by,
and good standing with, a certification body, such as the Hong Kong
Society of Accountants;
3.3.3.2 Holding a license to prepare
and sign clients' tax returns;
3.3.3.3 Membership in a professional
association which requires that its members be licensed or admitted
to a certifying or licensing entity and regularly verifies the accuracy
of its licensing data (such as the Hong Kong Law Society for barristers)
; or
3.3.3.4 Formation as an entity or
organization, or a unit of a larger organization that provides accountancy-related
services or is organized for such a purpose, and/or has a significant
portion of professional employees or members who satisfy one of
the above criteria, and registers on behalf of such entity or organization.
The above list of qualifications, however, is subject to change by
the Registry Operator in consultation with the Advisory Board once
it is established, provided that the qualifications reasonably ensure
conformity with the basic scope defined in Subsection 3.3.1 of this
Appendix L.
3.3.4 Verification. Qualification of applicants
for Registered Names within the accountancy profession PS-SLD will
be verified according to the process described in Section 8 of this
Appendix L.
4. Subsequent-Phase PS-SLDs.
4.1 Proposal. The Registry Operator may propose
to ICANN the introduction of PS-SLDs for additional professions. Before
making the proposal, the Registry Operator will consult with the Advisory
Board. The proposal will be submitted in writing to ICANN and will consist
of the following:
4.1.1 A statement of the basic scope of
the proposed PS-SLD, including a statement of the definition of the
professional category to be served by the PS-SLD in a format similar
to the definition contained in Subsection 3.1.1 of this Appendix L.
4.1.2 An explanation of why the additional
PS-SLD is consistent with the overall development of .pro as a TLD
restricted to persons and entities that are credentialed by appropriate
entities (such as through governmental bodies and professional organizations)
to provide professional services.
4.1.3 A statement of the second-level
label(s) to be used under .pro to designate the PS-SLD, together with
an explanation of why the label(s) is an (are) appropriate designator(s).
4.1.4 A description of the registration
qualifications initially to be applied in the PS-SLD. (See Subsection
3.1.3 of this Appendix L for an example.)
4.1.5 A description of the procedures
for verification of qualifications, which may consist of a reference
to Section 8 of this Appendix L.
4.1.6 A start-up documentation package
describing the arrangements for start-up of the PS-SLD, including
the proposed schedule, details on any sunrise period, and details
on registrar training.
4.1.7 A description of any Sub-Advisory
Board proposed to be established for the PS-SLD, including a statement
of the procedures for selecting members of the Sub-Advisory Board
and, if available, a listing of its proposed initial members. If the
Advisory Board has not yet become large enough to be sub-divided,
the proposal shall include a listing of the members representing the
PS-SLD to be invited to join the Advisory Board.
4.1.8 Evidence of support for establishment
of the PS-SLD among professionals and their associations, both generally
and within the professional category.
4.1.9 A written statement of views by
the Advisory Board, including any minority or supplemental statements.
4.2 Evaluation of Proposal. ICANN's evaluation
of the proposal will include at least the following considerations:
4.2.1 The extent to which the proposed
PS-SLD is consistent with the overall development of .pro as a TLD
restricted to persons and entities that are credentialed by appropriate
entities (such as through governmental bodies and professional organizations)
to provide professional services.
4.2.2 The extent to which qualifications
can be fairly and consistently applied.
4.2.3 The extent of support among professionals
generally and specifically within the professional category.
4.2.4 The adequacy of the Advisory Board
and any proposed Sub-Advisory Board to provide advice from the viewpoint
of the professional category on the operation of the PS-SLD.
4.3 Approval. To become effective, the proposal
must be approved in writing by ICANN, provided that in the event the
proposal is submitted with a resolution of support approved by a majority
vote of the Advisory Board then the proposal shall be deemed approved
by ICANN unless ICANN provides the Registry Operator written notice
of its objection to the proposal within sixty days after the proposal's
submission to ICANN. If ICANN does not act on a proposal of the Registry
Operator under Subsection 4.1 of this Appendix L within ninety days,
it will provide the Registry Operator a written report on the status
of its consideration.
4.4 Changes to Registration Qualifications.
Qualifications for registration in subsequent-phase PS-SLDs are subject
to change by the Registry Operator in consultation with the Advisory
Board (or, where there is a Sub-Advisory Board in operation for the
PS-SLD, in consultation with that Sub-Advisory Board), provided that
the qualifications reasonably ensure conformity with the basic scope
approved by ICANN under Subsection 4.2 of this Appendix L.
5. Advisory Board and Sub-Advisory Boards.
5.1 Advisory Board.
5.1.1 The Registry Operator will, no later
than the Commencement-of-Service Date, create an Advisory Board to
contribute to the development and implementation of the new .pro TLD.
The Advisory Board will initially be composed of representatives of
professional associations that are representative of the legal, medical,
and accountancy professions. As more PS-SLDs are added to .pro, representatives
of professional associations in those professional categories will
be invited to join the Advisory Board. While the initial Advisory
Board is intended to be approximately 9 members, the Advisory Board
is likely to increase in size as new PS-SLDs are added.
5.1.2 The Advisory Board will meet (in
person or by telephone) no less frequently than quarterly. Its functions
include:
5.1.2.1 assistance in identifying
relevant professional associations;
5.1.2.2 help in identifying new PS-SLDs
and formulating review proposals for their establishment under Section
4 of this Appendix L;
5.1.2.3 help in formulating proposals
for establishment of and adjustment to registration restrictions
and verification procedures, including designation of professional
organizations as members of the RPGA, membership in which meets
particular registration requirements (see, for example, Subsection
3.3.3.3 of this Appendix L);
5.1.2.4 providing recommendations
on any proposal by the Registry Operator to introduce the option
of allowing registrants to register two-label .pro domain names
(such a proposal must be approved in writing by ICANN under Subsection
2.6 of this Appendix L);
5.1.2.5 providing recommendations
on the establishment or discontinuance of Sub-Advisory Boards according
to Subsection 5.2 of this Appendix L;
5.1.2.6 providing recommendations
on additional labels for PS-SLDs according to Section 6 of this
Appendix L; and
5.1.2.7 otherwise providing advice
to the Registry Operator on the policies on the operation of the
.pro TLD.
The Advisory Board will direct its recommendations to the management
of the Registry Operator; if the Advisory Board finds that the Registry
Operator's management is taking actions that will violate the restrictions
of the .pro TLD or its PS-SLDs, the Advisory Board may send written
notice of its recommendation regarding such action to the Registry
Operator's Board of Directors and to ICANN.
5.2 Sub-Advisory Boards.
5.2.1 The Registry Operator may propose
the establishment of a Sub-Advisory Board for a particular PS-SLD,
either at or after the time the PS-SLD is proposed for introduction.
In either case, the Registry Operator will first consult with the
Advisory Board. The proposal will be made in writing to ICANN and
will include a statement of the procedures for selecting members of
the Sub-Advisory Board and, if available, a listing of its proposed
initial members, as well as a written statement from the Advisory
Board of its views (including any minority or supplemental statements)
on the appropriateness of the Sub-Advisory Board.
5.2.2 The Registry Operator may also propose
to ICANN in writing the discontinuation of an existing Sub-Advisory
Board. A discontinuation proposal will be accompanied by statements
of views (including any minority or supplemental statements) of the
Advisory Board and the Sub-Advisory Board to be discontinued.
5.2.3 To become effective, a proposal
to establish or discontinue a Sub-Advisory Board must be approved
in writing by ICANN, provided that in the event the proposal is submitted
with a resolution of support approved by a majority vote of the Advisory
Board then the proposal shall be deemed approved by ICANN unless ICANN
provides the Registry Operator written notice of its objection to
the proposal within thirty days after the proposal's submission to
ICANN. If ICANN does not act on a proposal of the Registry Operator
under this Subsection 5.2.3 within sixty days, it will provide the
Registry Operator a written report on the status of its consideration.
5.2.4 Each Sub-Advisory Board will operate
in the same manner as the Advisory Board, except the Sub-Advisory
Board's scope of responsibility will be limited to the PS-SLD for
which it was established. The various Sub-Advisory Boards may act
in concert, between themselves or with the Advisory Board, from time
to time.
6. Additional Labels for PS-SLDs. The Registry
Operator may propose additional second-level labels to be used in connection
with any already-established PS-SLD. These labels may indicate, for example,
a professional sub-category within the launched professional sector (such
as .nurse.pro for registered nurses) or a label signifying the profession
or professional subcategory in an additional language (such as .avocat.pro
for lawyers in France).
Before making the proposal, the Registry Operator will consult with the
Advisory Board and, if one is in operation, the Sub-Advisory Board for
the PS-SLD involved. The proposal will be submitted in writing to ICANN
and will include an explanation of the reasons supporting the proposal
and copies of any written comments (including any minority or supplemental
statements) of the Advisory Board or Sub-Advisory Board on the proposal.
To become effective, the proposal must be approved in writing by ICANN,
provided that in the event the proposal is submitted with a resolution
of support approved by a majority vote of the Advisory Board (or, where
there is a Sub-Advisory Board in operation for the PS-SLD, approved by
a majority vote of the Sub-Advisory Board) then the proposal shall be
deemed approved by ICANN unless ICANN provides the Registry Operator written
notice of its objection to the proposal within thirty days after the proposal's
submission to ICANN. If ICANN does not act on a proposal of the Registry
Operator under this Section 6 within sixty days, it will provide the Registry
Operator a written report on the status of its consideration.
7. Registration Requirements. All registrants
of Registered Names in the .pro TLD must enter into an electronic or paper
registration agreement with the Authorized Registrar that sponsors their
name within the registry (Appendix F). (As used in this Appendix L, the
term "Authorized Registrar" refers to a registrar accredited
by ICANN for the .pro TLD that has entered into, and has currently in
effect, the Registry-Registrar Agreement (Appendix F).) The electronic
or paper registration agreement shall include (in addition to terms otherwise
required in the Authorized Registrar's Registrar Accreditation Agreement
with ICANN) the following:
7.1 the registrant represents and warrants
that he, she, or it meets the registration requirements for the PS-SLD
in which the Registered Name is being registered;
7.2 the registrant agrees to notify the Authorized
Registrar promptly of any change in circumstances that causes the registrant
no longer to meet the registration requirements for the PS-SLD in which
the Registered Name is being registered;
7.3 the registrant represents and warrants
that the registrant and qualification data and other data required for
the issuance of a digital certificate that he, she, or it is submitting
is true and accurate;
7.4 the registrant agrees to provide to the
Authorized Registrar prompt corrections and updates to the registrant's
contact details throughout the term of the Registered Name registration,
7.5 in the case that a domain name is being
registered in the name of an organization or other entity, the person
acting on behalf of such organization or entity is authorized to do
so;
7.6 the registrant agrees to be subject to
and abide by the Sunrise and Verification, Sunrise Challenge Procedures,
Qualification Challenge Procedures (as set forth in Appendices J and
M), and the UDRP; and
7.7 violation of any of the provisions described
in Subsections 7.1 through 7.6 of this Appendix L shall be grounds for
termination to the registration, without any refund of fees to the registrant.
8. Verification Process.
8.1 General Information. Authorized Registrars
shall enforce the registration restrictions described in this Appendix
L and verify all registrants' right to register in the applicable PS-SLD
as a condition of registration. Authorized Registrars may either carry
out the verification manually (as set forth in Subsection 8.2 of this
Appendix L), have the Registry Operator conduct the verification (as
set forth in Subsections 8.2 or 8.3 of this Appendix L), or have an
association or other entity conduct the verification (but only if such
verification complies with the process set forth in Subsection 8.3 of
this Appendix L). These verification procedures may be modified or supplemented
by the procedures described in Section 5 of this Appendix L.
8.2 Manual Registration Verification. The
Manual Verification will proceed as follows:
8.2.1 When an applicant applies for a
.pro domain name through an Authorized Registrar, the Qualifications
Menu for the appropriate PS-SLD will appear in a drop-down window
in the Authorized Registrar's domain-name registration system.
8.2.2 The applicant will be required to
check off one of the qualifications and provide supporting evidence
of such qualification to the Authorized Registrar in order to register
the requested domain name.
8.2.3 The Authorized Registrar will be
required to comply with the following verification policies:
8.2.3.1 Obtain evidence of the applicable
restriction (e.g., copy of a certificate of passage of a U.S. state
bar exam);
8.2.3.2 Verify that the evidence submitted
meets the required qualifications for the PS-SLD (such as being
a type of evidence allowed in the qualification menu);
8.2.3.3 Compare the evidentiary information
to the information in the applicant's application to verify that
the evidence is representative of the particular applicant (e.g.,
does the name on the certificate match the applicant's name?);
8.2.3.4 Verify that the evidence is
a current, accurate, and true representation of the qualification;
8.2.3.5 Obtain certification of the
same from applicant;
8.2.3.6 Verify the registrant's identity
or obtain information required by a CCA for the issuance of a digital
certificate or other digital security products associated with such
domain name (see Section 9); and
8.2.3.7 Agree to indemnify the Registry
Operator against any challenges based on registrar's willful, negligent,
or other non-compliance with above policies.
8.2.4 The Authorized Registrar will confirm
to the Registry Operator receipt and verification of the evidence,
and the Registry Operator will process the registration.
8.2.5 The relevant qualification of the
registrant (basis of qualification, such as "medical license",
and jurisdiction such as "NY-USA") will be provided by the
Authorized Registrar to the Registry Operator and will appear in the
Registry Operator's Whois record of the domain name registration.
8.2.6 The Authorized Registrar will retain
the authoritative copy of the submitted and verified evidence for
the period stated in its Registrar Accreditation Agreement, will transfer
the evidence to a new repository in the event it ceases to be an Authorized
Registrar as also stated in its Registrar Accreditation Agreement,
and will also provide a copy to the Registry Operator.
8.2.7 In cases where the Registry Operator
is providing the Manual Verification service to the Authorized Registrar,
the Registry Operator will follow the process outlined in Subsections
8.2.2 - 8.2.6, except that the Registry Operator will provide the
notices to the Authorized Registrar where such notice would be required
from the Authorized Registrar to the Registry Operator and will retain
the authoritative copy of the submitted evidence.
8.3 Verification Toolkit. The Registry Operator
may offer Authorized Registrars the option to utilize verification services
provided by Registry Operator ("Verification Toolkit") or
by another entity to streamline the verification process. The procedure
for the Verification Toolkit or such other entity is as follows:
8.3.1 When an applicant applies for a
.pro domain name through an Authorized Registrar, the Qualifications
Menu for the appropriate PS-SLD will appear in the Authorized Registrar's
domain name registration system. An Authorized Registrar offering
domain names in only one or a limited number of the PS-SLDs may provide
a menu for only such PS-SLDs. An Authorized Registrar that is using
the Verification Toolkit may indicate in that window the contact information
for the Registry Operator. An Authorized Registrar that is using only
one of the qualification methods for a PS-SLD is allowed to provide
only that qualification in its registration system (instead of a full
Qualification Menu). The applicant will be required to check off one
of the qualifications and provide supporting evidence of that qualification
in order to register the requested domain name. The supporting information
will be provided either directly to the Registry Operator if the Authorized
Registrar has included direct contact information (as set forth above)
or to the Authorized Registrar. In the latter case, the Authorized
Registrar will forward the applicant's application and evidence of
qualification to the Registry Operator by electronic or other means.
8.3.1.1 The information provided to
the Registry Operator shall include data required by a CCA for the
issuance of a digital certificate or other digital security products
associated with the domain name (see Section 9).
8.3.2 The Verification Toolkit will verify
the registration application and qualification evidence under any
of the following methods:
8.3.2.1 The applicant's standing will
be verified with an appropriate credentialing organization, association,
or entity providing verification services.
8.3.2.2 For an applicant who is a
member of one of the associations in the RGPA (the RegistryPro Global
Partnership of Associations, a group of professional associations,
the members of which meet registration requirements as established
according to this Appendix L), the applicant will provide his, her,
or its membership identification in that association. The membership
will be verified against the RGPA network of organizations' databases
(and the name and identity of the applicant confirmed.)
8.3.3 The Registry Operator will notify
the Authorized Registrar upon completion of the verification.
8.3.4 The relevant qualification of the
registrant will appear in the Registry Operator's Whois record of
the domain-name registration and the authoritative copy of the evidence
will be maintained by the Authorized Registrar as required by its
Registrar Accreditation Agreement.
8.3.5 The Verification Toolkit may be
amended from time to time to include additional or revised professional
categories, non-English abbreviations of professional categories,
and qualifications that can be verified through the Verification Toolkit,
provided that it performs a reasonably sound verification of the qualifications
that are required for registration in the PS-SLDs. In the event that
verification requirements or procedures are modified or supplemented,
the Registry Operator will update the Verification Toolkit on the
schedule specified in connection with the modification or supplementation,
and consistent with the requirements of the Registry-Registrar Agreement
(Appendix F).
8.3.6 Authorizing Toolkit Providers. Entities
other than the Registry Operator may provide toolkits with functionality
equivalent to the Verification Toolkit ("Competitor Verification
Toolkits"), provided that they meet the requirements of Subsections
8.3.1 to 8.3.5 of this Appendix L. Competitor Verification Toolkit
Providers must apply to the Registry Operator for approval.
8.3.6.1 Audits. Within a commercially
reasonable amount of time an independent third party auditor designated
by ICANN after consultation with the Registry Operator ("Independent
Verification Auditor") or, on terms (including price and protection
of trade secrets) approved by ICANN in writing where appropriate
services of such an independent third-party auditor are not readily
available, the Registry Operator (or a sub-contractor) will conduct
a review of the Competitor Verification Toolkit Provider to verify
that it complies with the .pro eligibility policies.
8.3.6.2 If the entity meets all required
criteria, the Registry Operator will promptly authorize it as a
Competitor Verification Toolkit Provider.
8.3.6.3 In the event that the entity
does not pass this audit, the entity will be informed as to the
reason it does not meet the criteria and be given the chance to
correct the flaw and re-apply at a later date.
8.3.7 From time to time, at least annually,
a compliance review will be conducted of the Competitor Verification
Toolkit Provider to ensure that it continues to meet these criteria.
The compliance review shall be performed by an Independent Verification
Auditor or, on terms (including price and protection of trade secrets)
approved by ICANN in writing where appropriate services of such an
independent third-party auditor are not readily available, the Registry
Operator or a sub-contractor.
8.3.8 Verification of Equal Treatment of Competitor
Verification Toolkit Providers. The Registry Operator shall apply
the same standards in an equal manner to all companies and other entities
(including itself) acting as Verification Toolkit Providers or seeking
to act as Verification Toolkit Providers. Among other aspects, this
equal-treatment requirement means that the Registry Operator must
ensure that Competitor Verification Toolkit Providers have equal access
to becoming or designating members of the RGPA. The Registry Operator
shall provide ICANN with access all documents requested by ICANN that
are reasonably calculated to be used by ICANN in verification that
this equal-treatment requirement has been met.
8.3.9 Insurance. All companies and other
entities (including Registry Operator) acting as Verification Toolkit
Providers shall maintain, from the date on which they are first approved
to provide Verification Toolkits and for the duration of their approval,
insurance from an insurance provider with an AM Best rating of "A"
or better covering at least all claims (whenever made) arising from,
in connection with, or related to the Verification Toolkit or any
service provided by the provider in connection with the Verification
Toolkit or its use. The insurance maintained by Competitor Verification
Toolkit Providers shall name Registry Operator as an additional insured.
The initially required minimum limits of the insurance shall be US$2,000,000
per occurrence and US$2,000,000 aggregate per policy year. Registry
Operator may alter those minimum required limits uniformly for all
Verification Toolkit Providers with ICANN's written consent by providing
at least ninety days written notice to all Verification Toolkit Providers.
(Any increase shall apply only to occurrences arising after the effective
date of the increase.) Competitor Verification Toolkit Providers shall
on Registry Operator's written request provide a copy of the insurance
policy(ies) to the Registry Operator. Registry Operator shall upon
ICANN's written request provide a copy of the insurance policy(ies)
to ICANN.
8.4 Continued Professional Standing. The Registry
Operator will require the Authorized Registrar sponsoring each .pro
Registered Name periodically to re-verify continued qualifications of
Registered Name Holders. Periodic re-verification may proceed under
any of the methods described in Subsections 8.2 and 8.3 of this Appendix L.
8.4.1 Under Manual Verification, each
registrant's qualification for the applicable PS-SLD must be verified
on the anniversary of the registration date.
8.4.2 In cases of Toolkit Verification
or Competitor Toolkit Verification, each registrant's qualification
for the applicable PS-SLD must be verified on the anniversary of the
registration date, using one of the methods allowed under Subsection
8.3.
8.4.3 At the time of Verification under
8.4.1 or 8.4.2, the information related to the issuance of the digital
certificate or other digital security product associated with such
domain name will be verified for continued accuracy.
8.4.4 A sponsoring Authorized Registrar
that finds through the periodic verification or otherwise that a Registered
Name Holder no longer qualifies for his, her, or its registration
within a PS-SLD (including the digital security product requirements)
must provide electronic and written notice to the Registered Name
Holder and to the Registry Operator within seven days after such a
finding.
8.4.5 A Competitor Verification Toolkit
Provider that finds through the periodic verification that a Registered
Name Holder no longer qualifies for his, her, or its registration
within a PS-SLD (including the digital security product requirements)
must provide electronic notice within seven days to the Sponsoring
Registrar, which shall provide notice to the Registered Name Holder
and to the Registry Operator according to the first sentence of Subsection
8.4.4.
8.4.6 If the Registry Operator (a) finds
during a periodic verification process or is notified by an Authorized
Registrar (see Subsection 8.4.3 above) that a Registered Name Holder
no longer qualifies for a registration within a PS-SLD (including
the digital security requirements), or (b) is notified by an Authorized
Registrar of a reasonable basis to believe that any information in
the Registry Operator's Whois database regarding a .pro domain name
that the Authroized Registrar is sponsoring in the Registry is not
accurate or reliable, the Registry Operator will within a commercially
reasonable time lock down the domain name of such registrant so that
it cannot be modified ("Registry Lock"). The Registry Operator
will send an e-mail notice to the Registered Name Holder (at the contact
e-mail address(es) shown in Whois) and the sponsoring Authorized Registrar
that Registry Lock has been placed.
8.4.7 A Registered Name Holder whose domain
name has been placed on Registry Lock will have fourteen days from
the date e-mail notice of the lock has been sent to provide accurate
information or otherwise respond to the finding set forth in Subsections
8.4.4 through 8.4.6 of this Appendix L. The following procedure will
apply:
(i) In the case of a periodic verification by a sponsoring Authorized
Registrar according to Subsection 8.4.4 or notification of inaccurate
Whois information under Subsection 10.1,2, the Authorized Registrar
will instruct the Registered Name Holder to direct his, her, or
its response to the sponsoring Authorized Registrar. If the Registered
Name Holder does not update the information or respond to the satisfaction
of the sponsoring Authorized Registrar during the fourteen day period,
or if the updated information does not pass the Registrar's verification,
the registration will be cancelled and the Registered Name Holder
forfeits all registration and associated fees.
(ii) In the case of a Registry Lock resulting from information
from any source other than from a sponsoring Authorized Registrar,
the Registered Name Holder will be directed by the Registry Operator
to send his, her, or its response to the Registry Operator. If the
Registered Name Holder does not update the information or respond
to the satisfaction of the Registry Operator during the fourteen
day period, or if the updated information does not pass verification,
the registration will be cancelled and the Registered Name Holder
forfeits all registration and associated fees.
8.4.8 Periodic Verification Fees. There
may be a fee to the Registered Name Holder associated with a periodic
verification, as determined by the sponsoring Authorized Registrar.
There may be a fee to the sponsoring Authorized Registrar associated
with a periodic verification performed with a Verification Toolkit,
as determined by the supplier of the toolkit.
9. Digital Credentials. To enhance the security
and trust of .pro domain names, the Registry Operator will require Authorized
Registrars to provide digital certificates and other digital security
services associated with each domain name.
9.1 Digital Credentials. Certificates serve
as digital credentials and can be used to secure websites, e-mail communication,
and other applications. Due to the unique nature of the .pro domain,
these digital credentials are intended to assure that the domain name
holder's identity has been verified and that the domain name holder
has been verified to meet the qualifications in accordance with the
guidelines described in this Appendix L. To ensure that all .pro digital
security services meet these criteria and that consumers can easily
establish a chain of trust, the Registry Operator will require that
all certificates issued in conjunction with a .pro domain name chain
back to a common certificate root, which will be administered by the
Registry Operator. Commercial certificate authorities ("CCAs")
that provide comparable services and comply with certificate issuing
policies defined by the Registry Operator will be permitted to create
certificate roots that chain back to the common .pro certificate root
and provide the associated digital security services.
9.2 CCA Protocol. Due to the significant trust
conveyed by the .pro digital security services, the Registry Operator
will require that CCAs comply with the following baseline certificate
issuing practices. This list is not intended to be comprehensive and
the Registry Operator may modify the requirements for the provision
of digital certificates and other digital security services in the future
upon sixty days prior written notice to the Authorized Registrars and
to ICANN. These requirements will apply equally to all providers (including
the Registry Operator) seeking to provide digital certificates chaining
back to the common .pro certificate root. Registry Operator's compliance
with this equality requirement will be subject to verification as provided
in Subsection 9.4 of this Appendix L.
9.2.1 CCAs must verify the identity of
the individual or organization requesting the certificate. Certain
trusted third parties may perform this function, provided that such
all parties comply with the verification guidelines issued by the
Registry Operator and certify they have done so to the Registry Operator.
9.2.2 For organizations, CCAs must verify
that the request for the certificate is appropriately authorized.
Certain trusted third parties may perform this function, provided
that such all parties comply with the verification guidelines issued
by the Registry Operator and certify they have done so to the Registry
Operator.
9.2.3 CCAs must perform independent call-backs
("out-of-band" communications) to the individual or organization
to validate certificate information.
9.2.4 CCAs will verify that the individual
or organization requesting the certificate meets the registration
requirements defined in this Appendix L. Certain trusted third parties
may perform this function, provided that such all parties comply with
the verification guidelines issued by the Registry Operator and certify
they have done so to the Registry Operator.
9.2.5 CCA initial key size will be at
least 1024 bits.
9.2.6 A trusted hardware device (FIPS
140-1 Level 3 certifiable) must be used to create, protect, and destroy
the CCAs' private keys.
9.2.7 CCAs must have a clear "certificate
policy", as defined by X.509 Amendment 1 to ISO/IEC 9594-8:1995.
9.2.8 CCAs must issue certificates complying
with the X.509 standard.
9.2.9 CCAs must be capable of issuing
both X.509 v1 and X.509 v3 type certificates.
9.2.10 CCAs must provide appropriate
warranties and indemnities in respect of certificate issuing/verification
and confirming credentials.
9.2.11 Upon notification from (a) the
Registry Operator that the .pro domain name associated with a certificate
is subject to a transfer request or has been transferred to another
registrant or has been deleted, or (b) the Registry Operator or a
trusted third party used to validate some of the requirements for
certificate issuance that those requirements are no longer met, the
CCA must revoke the certificate. The CCA must maintain a publicly
available revocation list, and must transmit its revocation list to
the Registry Operator at least daily, or such CCA may operate a real-time
server that maintains a continuously updated list of revoked certificates.
9.3 Issuing Certificates. CCAs meeting these
criteria may issue, manage and revoke certificates to .pro domain registrants.
CCAs cannot authorize any other party to issue .pro digital certificates,
although the certificates can be transmitted to the registrant either
by the CCA or by the sponsoring Authorized Registrar for the .pro domain
name associated with the certificate. CCAs desiring to issue .pro certificates
must apply to the Registry Operator for approval.
9.3.1 Audits. Within a commercially reasonable
amount of time, an independent third party auditor designated by ICANN
upon consultation with the Registry Operator that provides auditing
services in the digital security industry ("CCA Auditor")
will conduct a review of the CCA to verify that it complies with the
.pro certification policies.
9.3.2 If the auditor determines that the
CCA meets all required criteria, the Registry Operator will promptly
use the .pro CA root key to sign the CCA's key used for .pro certificates.
9.3.3 In the event that the CCA does not
pass this audit, the CCA will be informed as to the reason it does
not meet the criteria and be given the chance to correct the flaw
and re-apply at a later date.
9.3.4 From time to time, at least annually,
a CCA Auditor will conduct a review of the CCA to ensure that it continues
to meet this criteria.
9.4 Verification of Equal Treatment of CCAs.
The Registry Operator shall apply the same standards in an equal manner
to all companies (including itself) acting as CCAs or seeking to act
as CCAs. The Registry Operator shall provide ICANN with access all documents
requested by ICANN that are reasonably calculated to be used by ICANN
in verification that this requirement has been met.
9.5 Chaining Fee. The Registry Operator may
charge sponsoring Accredited Registrars a chaining fee associated with
each certificate to cover administrative, licensing and associated costs
born by the Registry Operator, provided that such chaining fee may be
billed by the Registry Operator to the CCAs. The chaining fee will be
charged in compliance with Subsection 3.4.3 of the Registry Agreement.
10. Implementation by Authorized Registrars.
Authorized Registrars will be required to (a) collect and verify evidence
of professional credentials from all registrants showing their qualification
for the professional category in which they wish to register (see Section
8 of this Appendix L), (b) provide digital certificates and other digital
security services associated with each domain name, and (c) examine trademark
information for Sunrise Registrations (see Appendix J), before the Registry
Operator will process domain name applications.
10.1 Compliance by Authorized Registrars.
10.1.1 Each Authorized Registrar will
be required to comply with the restrictions, requirements, and policies
in Appendices J, L, and M, as well as other matters covered in its
Registrar Accreditation Agreement with ICANN and in its Registry-Registrar
Agreement ("RRA") (Appendix F) with the Registry Operator.
10.1.2 If an Authorized Registrar learns
of a reasonable basis to believe that any information in the Registry
Operator's Whois database regarding a .pro domain name that it is
sponsoring in the Registry is not accurate or reliable, the Authorized
Registrar shall provide electronic and written notice to the Registered
Name Holder and to the Registry Operator within seven days after learning
of that basis. See Subsection 8.4.6 for follow-up procedures.
10.1.3 Each Authorized Registrar will
be required to verify continued eligibility of a registrant no less
frequently than on an annual basis.
10.1.4 If it comes to the Registry Operator's
attention that an Authorized Registrar is not complying with the restrictions
and policies described in Subsections 10.1.1 to 10.1.3 of this Appendix
L, the Registry Operator will send prompt electronic and written notice
to the Authorized Registrar, with a copy by the same method to ICANN,
describing the restrictions and policies being violated. The ensuing
procedure concerning the Authorized Registrar's eligibility to continue
to sponsor Registered Names (including suspension and de-accrediation)
in the .pro registry is governed by the RRA (Appendix F) and the Registrar
Accreditation Agreement.
10.2 Domain Names Sponsored by Ineligible Authorized
Registrars. If an Authorized Registrar's accreditation by ICANN
for .pro is terminated or expires without renewal, or its RRA is terminated
or expires without renewal, the following procedure will be followed:
10.2.1 The domain names already registered
up to that point in time will remain registered in the .pro TLD. Those
domain names, together with the verification documentation or information
for such domain name held by the Ineligible Authorized Registrar,
will be transferred to another Authorized Registrar upon proper transfer
notice made by the gaining Authorized Registrar or, in the absence
of such notice, designated by ICANN.
10.2.2 Applicants for .pro names working
with such Ineligible Authorized Registrar will be notified to switch
to another Authorized Registrar. The Ineligible Authorized Registrar
is required to send the eligibility documentation submitted by each
applicant to the new Authorized Registrar chosen by such applicant.
11. Disclaimer. The provisions of this Registry
Agreement (including Appendices J, L, and M) shall not create any actual
or potential liability on the part of Registry Operator to any person
or entity other than ICANN in connection with any dispute concerning any
Registered Name or other Registry Service, including the decision of any
dispute resolution proceeding related to any of the foregoing.
Earlier draft:
14 February
2002
Comments concerning
the layout, construction and functionality of this site
should be sent to webmaster@icann.org.
Page Updated
27-Apr-2002
©2002
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.
All rights
reserved.
|