Proposed Change to ICANN Bylaws Regarding Number of GNSO Council Representatives – Public Comment Forum
18 March 2005
Background:
The key issues regarding the number of representatives per constituency are the effectiveness and representativeness of the GNSO Council. The external review of the GNSO Council found that although a larger Council membership creates some coordination issues (e.g. on Council conference calls), the overall effect on Council effectiveness is positive. Maintaining three representatives assists in workload distribution and attendance of all constituencies on conference calls. It also helps the GNSO Council to continuously improve the geographic representativeness of its membership.
The independent consultant interviewed Council members and key stakeholders of the GNSO. He found that "In fact every single person who was interviewed (including those who had previously stated that they believed that the number of representatives should be reduced to two)was either strongly in favour of the current three representatives (a significant majority) or neutral on the issue."
Proposed change to the ICANN Bylaws:
ARTICLE X: GENERIC NAMES SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION
Section 3. GNSO COUNCIL
The proposed change is indicated in the text in bold type above. Article X(3)(1) previously read as: "Subject to the provisions of the Transition Article of these Bylaws, the GNSO Council shall consist of two representatives selected by each of the Constituencies described in Section 5 of this Article, and three persons selected by the ICANN Nominating Committee."
Please submit your comments in time for consideration at ICANN's Board meeting in Mar del Plata, Argentina, on 8 April 2005.