RSSAC Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA
31 July 2000
RSSAC meeting 7
- Raw Notes
Pittsburgh, PA. -
Washington Rm.
Attendees:
| Jun Muri - chair
& M |
Randall Hayes
- G & H |
| Kato-san - M |
Gerry Sn. - D |
| Ray Pilzk - H
& G |
Mark K. - advisor
NSI |
| Louie Touton
- ICANN |
Tom Newell -
A & J |
| Geoff Houston
- IEPG |
Evi - advisor |
| Havard - I |
Mirium - K &
Ripe |
| DRC - E &
F |
Karen Rose -
DoC |
| Chris Yarnell
- E & F |
Sz. - L |
| Chris F. - K |
Jessica L. -
G & H |
Agenda:
- ICANN process regarding
RSSAC - jun
- Primary transition
- drc
- Contractual process
- markk/louis
- Locations of new
servers - evi/bmanning
- DNSSEC status -
bmanning
- IPv6 - kato
- IDN impact - bmanning
- Schedule
This mtg is by invitation
only. No announced public portion.
If requested, at the
end.
1. ICANN process
regarding RSSAC - Jun
- New arch. - dedicated
primary for root zone (et.al.)
- technically discussed
and prepared (apprved?)
- When is a subject
for discussion (contractual binding?)
- what are the operational
requirements?
- Contract status?
- formal agreement
is the goal
- crada - MoU for
existing capabilities, not all
- (USgov & PSI
not signed up)
- Formal draft circulated
27july2000 PDT.
- Under review.
DoC & ICANN want both.
OpReq.
Prior art. 2010,
2870, DNSOPS ---- more later.
- 15July - ICANN
board mtg. passed resolutions pertanent to RSSAC.
- Apublic transition
plan based on dedicated primary
- We are working
on implementation plan. plans available
- By EOM aug.2000
- President is authorized
to request and wrk w/ DoC on
- Transition plan
including editiorial control of the zone.
- Expend funds to
make these things happen.
- URL for the data
on ICANN site.
- Markk - not part
of the RSSAC process. "railroaded"?
- Louie - four drafts
out in last call - no received comments.
- Is the document
ok? sure.
- Ray - would be
nice to see in final form prior to announcement.
- Bill - possible
mis-reading of the resolution statements.
- Louie - resoultion
00.58 is the board acceptance of the transition plan.
- (bill... which
version?)
- Ray - have a better
process in future.
2. Primary transition
- drc
drc - operational
requirements of the transition.
- Should refine
things like 2870 for the DM.
- What are the technical
requirements for roviding the service
- Rootops need to
be comfortable.
- Louie - what is
the schedule.
- drc - 15aug is
a nice target for a first draft.
- Louie - why do
the root ops consider this important vs rssac.
- drc - root-ops
bear the brunt of failure in the user community.
- RSSAC is an advisory
- Louie - document
should be guided by performance vs operations.
- Bill - ops is a
consideration.
- drc - anything
that affects operations is a concern.
- Louie - only NSI
publishes - will work with them
- drc/bill - operational
impact is real.
- Rootops can advise
rssac & rssac can advise ICANN.
- (do to overlap
how can rssac advise icann w/o rootops)
- Markk - can icann
publish expectaions (timeframes et.al.)?
- Louie - schedule
is important. (missing data) - don't want a
- 7/8 month slip.
Want this by 31aug2000.
1) Recommend an enhanced
arch. - 00.58 approved.
2) Proceedural plan on transition. "shifting" - onestep plan
approved by rssac
3) Implementation plan (concreate dates)
4) Document IANA proceedures (what drc holds?)
5) The contract for services.
- MarkK - "here
to help" -
- Ray - does all
this need to be in stone or can we have "jello" that can be
ammenable to DoC approval?
- Louie - ammenable.
- Karen - stuff.....
seems to echo Louis thoughts. Are we comfortable and avoiding delays?
- Tom n. - ammendments
to cooperative agreement pending?
- Karen - yes, there
will need to be. Need to include ICANN et.al.
- (lots of discussion
- generally we think these points are ok and we can try and meet the
targets)
- Ray - has any thought
been given to operations?
- Louie - run by
staff.
3. Contractual
process - MarkK/Louis
Major rewrite sent
out "late". some comments received. more are desirable. DoC
wants formal agreements for stablity. W/organizations not people. People
are listed as ops. drawn from 2870 w/ modifications. RSSAC has an ongoing
role in tweeking the specs. Something implementable now and can evolve
to meet future needs. Exibit A needs careful review. The other document
to our various legal staffing.
MarkK& Bill &
Ray - what does it mean to "resign"?
Jun/Louie - two week
turn time. (yeah right... :)
Missed getting notes
for my stuff and Kato's
END